121

I am newbie in spring boot rest services. I have developed some rest api in spring boot using maven project.

I have successfully developed Get and Post Api. My GET Method working properly in postman and mobile. when i am trying to hit post method from postman its working properly but from mobile its gives 403 forbidden error.

This is my Configuration:

spring.datasource.url = jdbc:mysql://localhost/sampledb?useSSL=false spring.datasource.username = te spring.datasource.password = test spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.dialect= org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5InnoDBDialect Hibernate ddl auto (create, create-drop, validate, update) spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto = update 

Please Suggest me how to solve error.

enter image description here

11
  • Are you sending any header with postman? I think that you are sending a token in order to authenticate the request. Are you sending this token on POST from your mobile device? Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:44
  • 1
    Please add details of your spring-boot configuration. Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:47
  • i am sending only Content type from postman and mobile @desoss Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:49
  • please attach the logs, spring has surprisingly readable error messages in logs ;) Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:53
  • This is my configurations: #spring.datasource.url = jdbc:mysql://192.168.4.2/maha?useSSL=false #spring.datasource.username = test #spring.datasource.password = test@123 # # ### Hibernate Properties ## The SQL dialect makes Hibernate generate better SQL for the chosen database #spring.jpa.properties.hibernate.dialect = org.hibernate.dialect.MySQL5InnoDBDialect # ## Hibernate ddl auto (create, create-drop, validate, update) #spring.jpa.hibernate.ddl-auto = update @JannikWeichert Commented May 23, 2018 at 10:54

9 Answers 9

263

you have to disable csrf Protection because it is enabled by default in spring security: here you can see code that allow cors origin.

import org.springframework.context.annotation.Bean; import org.springframework.security.config.annotation.web.builders.HttpSecurity; import org.springframework.security.config.annotation.web.configuration.EnableWebSecurity; import org.springframework.security.config.annotation.web.configuration.WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter; import org.springframework.web.cors.CorsConfiguration; import org.springframework.web.cors.CorsConfigurationSource; import org.springframework.web.cors.UrlBasedCorsConfigurationSource; @EnableWebSecurity public class WebSecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter{ @Override protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception{ http.cors().and().csrf().disable(); } @Bean CorsConfigurationSource corsConfigurationSource() { CorsConfiguration configuration = new CorsConfiguration(); configuration.setAllowedOrigins(Arrays.asList("*")); configuration.setAllowedMethods(Arrays.asList("*")); configuration.setAllowedHeaders(Arrays.asList("*")); configuration.setAllowCredentials(true); UrlBasedCorsConfigurationSource source = new UrlBasedCorsConfigurationSource(); source.registerCorsConfiguration("/**", configuration); return source; } } 
Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

7 Comments

disabling csrf made my POST requests successful! what a relief.
Why disabling csrf allowed post method?
@Ezzat Eissa - Disabling csrf certainly works. But this also makes our APIs vulnerable, isn't it? If so how do make sure that csrf token is configured both from server and client side?
This answer should come with some warning. There are some good reasons to keep csrf enabled. To work with csrf enabled: docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/3.2.x/reference/…
Spring 6 update, http.csrf(AbstractHttpConfigurer::disable)
|
12

In Spring Security Cross-site check is by default enable, we need to disable it by creating a separate class to stop cross-checking.

package com.baba.jaxws; import org.springframework.context.annotation.Configuration; import org.springframework.security.config.annotation.web.builders.HttpSecurity; import org.springframework.security.config.annotation.web.configuration.WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter; @Configuration public class SecurityConfig extends WebSecurityConfigurerAdapter{ @Override //we have stopped the csrf to make post method work protected void configure(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception{ http.cors().and().csrf().disable(); } } 

Comments

8

Possible causes:

  1. Requests done from postman are different to the one done from mobile (uri, method, headers)
  2. Invalid token
  3. CORS (read something about it, google is full of articles) add @CrossOrigin annotation to your controller.
  4. mobile app is doing an OPTION request before performing the POST, and you block OPTION requests. If also from postman the OPTION requests are blocked, add the property spring.mvc.dispatch-options-request=true. Moreover, in case you are using spring security, you have to explicitly allow OPTION requests also for it.

4 Comments

can you please tell me how to add option request ?@desoss
I've updated point 4... let me know if with spring.mvc.dispatch-options-request=true it works.
yes i am trying with that. i will let you know if worked
Yes, you are right - the POST request from Postman was considered CORS, but just wondering why the GET requests from Postman were going through even though CORS is disabled?
8

CSRF is enabled by default in Spring Security. Having this enabled ensures a 403 error on HTTP requests that would change (object) states. For more information please visit: https://docs.spring.io/spring-security/site/docs/3.2.x/reference/htmlsingle/html5/#csrf

It is possible to disable CSRF in the Spring Security. However, it is enabled by default (convention over configuration) and for a good reason. This is also explained in the link provided to Spring's Security.

A working example, using Thymeleaf, might be:

HTML

<head> <meta name="_csrf" th:content="${_csrf.token}"/> <meta name="_csrf_header" th:content="${_csrf.headerName}"/> </head> 

JS

function postExample() { let token = $("meta[name='_csrf']").attr("content"); let header = $("meta[name='_csrf_header']").attr("content"); let data = {username: "", password: "", firstname: "", lastname: ""}; // Object key string interpolation by {[header]:token} works with ES6 fetch(window.location+"/addnote", { method:"POST", headers: { [header]: token, "charset": "UTF-8", "Content-Type": "application/json" }, body: JSON.stringify(data) }).then(res => console.log(res)).catch(err => console.log(err)) } 

CONTROLLER per request of @mahmoud-magdy

@PostMapping("/addnote") public Long addNote(@RequestBody() String data) { Gson gson = new Gson(); JSONAddNote json = gson.fromJson(data, JSONAddNote.class); return <service>.addNote(json.username, json....); } class JSONAddNote { public String username; public String ...etc } 

Or a more direct CONTROLLER:

@PostMapping("/addnote") public Long addNote(@RequestBody Data data) { return <service>.addNote(data); } class Data { public String username; public String ...etc } 

1 Comment

could you please mention the last part in controller how to retrieve the data
6

I was able to solve this by using:

<form th:action="@{url}" method="post"> 

Instead of:

<form action="url" method="post"> 

It seems the th:action tag does url rewriting to enable csrf validation.

2 Comments

Indeed indeed indeed! This is also explained here : "After some investigation I've found out that only forms that were using 'th:action' attribute (not plain 'action') had the csrf token injected."
This is the solution. I don't understand how disabling CSRF protection is the accepted answer.
2

To build on the accepted answer

Many HTTP client libraries (eg Axios) implicitly set a Content-Type: JSON header for POST requests. In my case, I forgot to allow that header causing only POSTS to fail.

@Bean CorsConfigurationSource corsConfigurationSource() { ... configuration.addAllowedHeader("Content-Type"); // <- ALLOW THIS HEADER ... } 

1 Comment

I think you meant Content-Type: application/json instead of Content-Type: JSON
1

This answer is related to this question if you are deploying to Open/WAS Liberty server.

If so, you might get 403 error even though your code works perfectly fine if deploying to embedded Tomcat that comes with Spring boot.

Liberty does not read (or considers) your

server.servlet.context-path=/myapi/v1 

that you set in your application.properties or application.yml file for some reason. Or, it just overwrites it, not sure. So, the above context-path will work just fine if deployment in Spring Boot embeded Tomcat container.

However, when you deploy it to OpenLiberty/WASLiberty, you might find that your endpoints will stop working and you get 403 and/or 404 errors.

In my example, I have api where I have /auth endpoint in my WebSecurityConfiguration class:

//Customize the /login url to overwrite the Spring default provided /login url. private AuthenticationFilter authenticationFilter() throws Exception { final AuthenticationFilter filter = new AuthenticationFilter(authenticationManager()); // This works fine on embedded tomcat, but not in Liberty where it returns 403. // To fix, in server.xml <appllication> block, add // <application context-root="/myapi/v1" ... and then both // auth and other endpoints will work fine in Liberty. filter.setFilterProcessesUrl("/auth"); // This is temporary "fix" that creates rather more issues, as it // works fine with Tomcat but fails in Liberty and all other // endpoints still return 404 //filter.setFilterProcessesUrl("/v1/auth"); return filter; } 

Based on the above context-path, on Tomcat, it becomes /myapi/v1/auth while on Liberty, it ends up being just /myapi/auth which is wrong. I think what Liberty does, it will just take the name of the api and add to it the endpoint, therefore ignoring the versioning.

As a result of this, AntPathRequestMatcher class matches() method will result in a non-matching /auth end point and you will get 403 error. And the other endpoints will result in 404 error.

SOLUTION

In your application.properties, leave

server.servlet.context-path=/myapi/v1 

, this will be picked up by embedded Tomcat and your app will continue to work as expected.

In your server.xml configuration for Open/WAS Liberty, add matching context-root to the section like:

<application context-root="/myapi/v1" id="myapi" location="location\of\your\myapi-0.0.1.war" name="myapi" type="war"> 

, this will be picked up by Open/WASLiberty and your app will continue to work as expected on Liberty container as well.

Comments

1

This is for those that like me came here because they were writing post tests and encountered 403 instead of any expected errors (depending on code state).

Instead of disabling csrf one can obtain the CSRF token so that you can use it in the header of the call, much like how it works with a form in Thymeleaf.

With tests you just add with(csrf()) to the call like here

mvc.perform(post("/") .with(csrf()) //CSRF token is sent .contentType("application/json") .content("")) .andExpect(status().isCreated()); 

This way you can move ahead without disabling CSRF, much like how it likely will work in the production code. There are also other options as you can read in the Testing with CSRF Protection documentation.

If you later need to make this present also in your actual Thymeleaf form you can add csrf to it as a hidden type:

<input type="hidden" th:name="${_csrf.parameterName}" th:value="${_csrf.token}" /> 

Comments

0

CSRF is enabled by default in spring security, it blocks non-browser POST requests. We will need to disable the CSRF protection in spring security config

@Configuration public class SecurityConfig { @Bean public SecurityFilterChain filterChain(HttpSecurity http) throws Exception { http.authorizeHttpRequests(auth -> auth .requestMatchers( "/v3/api-docs/**", "/swagger-ui/**", "/swagger-ui.html" ).permitAll() .anyRequest().authenticated() ) .csrf(csrf -> csrf.disable()) return http.build(); } 

Comments

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.