Skip to content

BasirS/income-distribution-poverty-dynamics

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

12 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Global Income Distribution and Poverty Dynamics

Overview

This repository contains a comprehensive analysis exploring the relationship between income distribution patterns and poverty reduction effectiveness across countries. The research examines whether economic growth alone drives poverty reduction or if the distribution of that growth plays an equally important role in successful development strategies.

Using statistical analysis in R, this project integrates six complementary global datasets spanning 1970–2024 to analyze how different inequality metrics correlate with poverty reduction outcomes. The findings reveal that countries achieving both economic growth and more equitable distribution were most successful at poverty reduction, suggesting that development strategies should address both aspects simultaneously.

Data Description

The analysis integrates six complementary datasets:

  • Mean Income/Consumption Per Day: Country-level average daily income values (2,705 observations)
  • Median Income/Consumption Per Day: Country-level median daily income values (2,705 observations)
  • Poorest Decile Threshold: Income threshold marking the poorest 10% by country (2,705 observations)
  • Richest Decile Threshold: Income threshold marking the richest 10% by country (2,705 observations)
  • Number Below Poverty Lines: Absolute counts of people below eight poverty thresholds (2,705 observations)
  • Share Below Poverty Lines: Percentage of population below poverty thresholds (1,468 observations)

Methodology

The analysis employs several statistical techniques implemented in R:

  1. Calculation of inequality metrics (mean-to-median ratio, richest-to-poorest decile ratio)
  2. Time series analysis of poverty reduction trajectories
  3. Correlation analysis between income levels, inequality measures, and poverty rates
  4. Regression modeling to quantify relationships between income, inequality, and poverty
  5. Growth incidence analysis comparing different income segments across countries
  6. Case-study comparisons between successful and less successful countries

Key Findings

Primary Results

This comprehensive analysis of global income distribution and poverty dynamics (1970-2024) reveals several critical insights:

1. Economic Growth Alone is Insufficient

  • Higher mean income strongly predicts lower poverty rates (r = -0.481, p < 0.001)
  • However, the effectiveness of economic growth is significantly moderated by income distribution patterns
  • Countries with both growth and equity show the most successful poverty reduction

2. Inequality Dramatically Affects Poverty Reduction

  • Significant interaction between income and inequality in the regression model (β = -0.983, p < 0.001)
  • A 10% increase in mean income reduces poverty by 0.78 percentage points in countries with moderate inequality (richest-to-poorest ratio of 5)
  • The same income increase reduces poverty by only 0.29 percentage points in highly unequal countries (ratio of 10)

3. Regional Success Patterns

  • East Asia: Most dramatic poverty reduction (from ~90% to near 0%) while maintaining moderate inequality
  • Europe: Consistently low poverty rates with stable, low inequality measures
  • Latin America: High inequality persistence despite moderate progress
  • Sub-Saharan Africa: Highest poverty rates with highest inequality levels

4. Success Case Studies Countries achieving over 96% poverty reduction typically combined strong economic growth with stable/decreasing inequality:

  • Malaysia: 100% reduction (2.68% → 0%)
  • South Korea: 100% reduction (0.25% → 0%)
  • Chile: 97.4% reduction (15.4% → 0.40%)
  • Costa Rica: 96.6% reduction (25.9% → 0.88%)

5. Statistical Model Performance

  • The most comprehensive regression model explains 57.9% of variance in poverty rates
  • Model includes interaction effects between income and inequality measures
  • Gini coefficient shows strongest correlation with poverty (r = 0.531)

Policy Implications

  • Development strategies must address both economic growth and distributional patterns
  • Regional differences require tailored approaches
  • Monitoring both income levels and inequality measures is crucial
  • Evidence-based policy decisions should consider the income-inequality-poverty nexus

Data Source: All analyses based on datasets from Our World in Data

Repository Structure

global-income-distribution-poverty-dynamics/ ├── data/ # Data files │ ├── meanincomeorconsumptionperday.csv │ ├── medianincomeorconsumptionperday.csv │ ├── thepoorestdecile.csv │ ├── therichestdecile.csv │ ├── numberofpeoplelivingbelowarangeofpovertylines.csv │ └── shareofpopulationlivingbelowarangeofpovertylines.csv ├── scripts/ # R code files │ └── poverty_analysis.R # Main analysis script ├── output/ # Generated figures and tables ├── docs/ # Project report and documentation ├── LICENSE # MIT License └── README.md # This file 

License

This project is licensed under the MIT License – see the LICENSE file for details.

About

Analysis of how income distribution patterns affect poverty reduction success across countries using R statistical analysis of global economic data (1970-2024).

Topics

Resources

License

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

 
 
 

Contributors

Languages