Added Kushagra Gupta to contributors in pgRouting-introduction.rst

[Kushagra0811]

Fixes # .

Changes proposed in this pull request:

• Added Kushagra Gupta to contributors in pgRouting-introduction.rst as part of GSOC application Task 2

Summary by CodeRabbit

• Documentation
  • Updated project contributor credits.

_{✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.}

[coderabbitai]

Walkthrough

The changes update contributor attribution across documentation and locale files. Kushagra Gupta is added to the "Individuals (in alphabetical order)" contributors list, replacing a previous entry. Locale metadata timestamps are updated to reflect current generation dates.

Changes

Cohort / File(s)	Summary
Documentation Contributors doc/src/pgRouting-introduction.rst	Added Kushagra Gupta to the alphabetically-ordered contributors list
Locale Metadata & Contributors locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po, locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot	Updated POT-Creation-Date timestamps (2025-10-28 → 2026-01-11) and refreshed contributor list entries in locale metadata, replacing Kishore Kumar with Kushagra Gupta

Estimated code review effort

🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes

Poem

🐰 A new name hops into the list so bright,
Kushagra joins the contributors' hall of light,
The timestamps dance from autumn days of old,
To winter's freshly-minted record, bold! 🌟

🚥 Pre-merge checks | ✅ 3

✅ Passed checks (3 passed)

Check name	Status	Explanation
Description Check	✅ Passed	Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
Title check	✅ Passed	The title accurately reflects the main change in the PR: adding Kushagra Gupta to the contributors list in pgRouting-introduction.rst.
Docstring Coverage	✅ Passed	No functions found in the changed files to evaluate docstring coverage. Skipping docstring coverage check.

_{✏️ Tip: You can configure your own custom pre-merge checks in the settings.}

---

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

• X
• Mastodon
• Reddit
• LinkedIn

_{Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.}

[coderabbitai]

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)

locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot (1)

9-17: POT-Creation-Date churn: OK, but consider reproducible builds if desired.

Updating POT-Creation-Date is expected when regenerating catalogs; if you want fewer noisy diffs across rebuilds, consider configuring the tooling for reproducible timestamps (e.g., SOURCE_DATE_EPOCH) rather than embedding the current time.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: Organization UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4f0eec5 and 8fc7069.

📒 Files selected for processing (3)

• doc/src/pgRouting-introduction.rst
• locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po
• locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot

🔇 Additional comments (4)

doc/src/pgRouting-introduction.rst (1)

149-149: ✓ Contributor addition is correctly formatted and alphabetically ordered.

The new entry "Kushagra Gupta" is properly positioned in the alphabetized list and follows the existing formatting convention. The alphabetical order is maintained correctly between "Ko Nagase" and "Mahmoud Sakr".

locale/pot/pgrouting_doc_strings.pot (1)

7198-7206: Contributor list update looks consistent; confirm whether “Kishore Kumar” should remain listed.

The updated msgid adds “Kushagra Gupta” and keeps alphabetical ordering in the “Ki/Ko/Ku” region. If the intent was to replace an existing entry, double-check whether “Kishore Kumar” should still be present.

locale/en/LC_MESSAGES/pgrouting_doc_strings.po (2)

8395-8401: Whitespace and format consistency are correct. "Ko Nagase" and "Kushagra Gupta" are properly spaced across line breaks, and the alphabetical order is maintained throughout the contributor list. The PO file structure is valid.

---

11-11: I need the review comment content (within <review_comment> tags) to verify and rewrite. Please provide the review comment you'd like me to analyze.