There's this particular user (who shall remain nameless) who has a very high reputation, and many gold tag badges, who, I've noticed, tends to unilaterally close posts in those tags as duplicates. In most cases I've seen of this user doing so, it's because the so call "duplicate" implies the question. However, this usually happens in cases where the question is clearly asked by a beginner, for whom it might not be obvious how the questions are related. And I don't mean that it implies the question in the sense that it's a particular case of a bigger theorem, but more like, through some argument plus some elementary idea, one might transform that question into a proof.
To me intuitively this shouldn't count as a duplicate, as especially if the user is a beginner, the extra idea/argument to transform the other (seemingly unrelated for a beginner) question into a proof should be the answer. I'm sure they're an expert on said particular area, and might find the connection between the questions trivial, but to a beginner this might be extremely non-obvious. To me, that I do research in a different area, it sometimes takes me a minute or so to see why the linked question implies the 'dupe'. My question is, should situations like these be considered dupes? Is there a definition somewhere of what constitutes a dupe that covers these cases? This is a very knowledgeable person in said area, who always posts quality answers, but I worry that they may not be able to see that not everyone is as knowledgeable and used to that particular area
