2
$\begingroup$

Given a random process $X(t)$, it's mean can be found as

$$\langle X(t) \rangle = \lim_{T \rightarrow \infty} \frac{1}{T}\int_0^T X(t) \mathrm{d}t$$

The normal way of estimating this would be to simply take the a finite value of $T$ and then numerically integrate (e.g. left rectangle rule or trapezoid rule). For increasing $T$, the convergence of the estimate for left rectangle rule is $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{T})$ (or something to that effect).

I've been toying around with the idea of:

  1. Using higher order quadrature methods
  2. Whether use of higher order quadrature methods increases the accuracy of the estimate and/or improves the convergence of the estimate with respect to $T$

I've tried searching, but haven't found any literature (or anything on the internet) proposing solutions for 1 or an answer for 2.

Specifically, I have two ideas:

Gauss-Laguerre Quadrature

This is a Gauss quadrature that evaluates integrals with a domain of $[0,\infty)$. While this could be used to evaluate

$$ \int_0^\infty X(t) \mathrm{d}t$$

I can't then divide by $1/T$. This in addition to the fact that the integral obviously does not converge without the fraction scaling at the front of it. If there were some way to get the $1/T$ term into the integrand, then maybe this could work?

Composite Gauss Quadrature

This would simply break up some finite span $[0,T)$ into a series of pieces, then use "standard" Gauss-Legendre quadrature. Obviously the integral will be more accurate, but whether it improves the mean estimate, I'm not sure.

Disclaimer: I know that the order accuracy result of Gaussian quadrature (and others) comes from refinement of a fixed domain rather than improved convergence for increasing $T$. I'm just wondering if there's been any results for problems like this

$\endgroup$
2
  • $\begingroup$ Depending on your random process the rectangle rules actually may not be quite as bad as $\mathcal O(1/\sqrt{N})$. Apparently if $X(t)$ is a Wiener process they converge at a rate of $\mathcal O(\sqrt{\log N}/N)$ with probability $1$. $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 2 at 3:24
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Interesting! Unfortunately the problem I'm specifically interested (statistics of turbulent fluid flow) isn't a Wiener process. That said, the proof at least shows that there are some exceptions to the $\mathcal{O}(1/\sqrt{N})$ rule. Thanks! $\endgroup$ Commented Apr 2 at 13:28

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.