0
$\begingroup$

In this article, the condition for the Mellin inversion theorem (MIT) is that the inverse Mellin transform $$ f(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_{c-i\infty}^{c+i\infty} F(s) x^{-s} \, ds $$ converges absolutely and uniformly for $c \in (a,b)$, with $F(s)$ being some function that is analytic in the strip $a < \Re(s) < b$. This is so that the Fourier inversion theorem (FIT) can be used to prove the former theorem. However, I am struggling to that the aforementioned condition is sufficient. In my attempted proof of the MIT, I arrive at $$ \mathcal{F}^{-1}\{F_\xi\}(t) = e^{-ct} \mathcal{M}^{-1}\{F\}\left(e^{-t}\right), $$ where $s = c + 2\pi i \xi$ and $F_\xi (\xi) = F(s)$. This is where I am to apply the FIT and then proceed to easily complete the proof. The version of the FIT that I am working with requires $F$ to be piecewise continuous, as well as $F_\xi$ and $\mathcal{F}\{F_\xi\}$ being $\mathcal{L}^1(\mathbb{R})$. Since $F_\xi$ is analytic, it is piecewise continuous. It is also easy to show that it is integrable from the convergence of the inverse Mellin transform. How do I show that $\mathcal{F}\{F_\xi\}$ is also integrable? I have seen examples on this site of integrable functions with fourier transfroms that are not integrable.

$\endgroup$

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.