0
$\begingroup$

In singularity theory, one defines an intrinsic derivative for a vector bunle homomorphism $\phi: E \rightarrow F$ where $E\xrightarrow{\pi_E}B$ and $F\xrightarrow{\pi_F}B$ are vector bundles with fibers diffeomorphic to $L'$ and $L$. This construction is useful for example to define the Hessian of a real valued map on a manifold at a critical point without an inner product structure present. This is my understanding of how it is defined:

For $b \in B$ and a small neighbourhood $U$ around $b$ in $B$, take trivializations for $\Phi$ and $\Psi$ for $E$ and $F$. In trivialized coordinates, $\phi$ could be thought of as a map $\phi:U\times L_1 \rightarrow U\times L_2$ given by $\phi(b, v) = (b, K(b, v))$ with $v \in L$, $K(b, v) \in L'$ and $K$ linear in $v$. Therefore, $DK(b, v)$ could be thoguht of as a bi-linear map of the form $T_bB \times E_b \rightarrow F_b$ where $E_b = \pi_E^{-1}(b)$ and $F_b = \pi_F^{-1}(b)$. Intrinsically however, this would define a coordinate independent bi-linear map, for each $b \in B$ of the form $T_bB \times \ker \phi_b \rightarrow \mathrm{coker} \phi_b$.

Question: I would like to see if this intrinsic derivative could be defined without coordinates. Since the intuition is that we are taking partial derivative with respect to $b$ for a smooth family of linear maps $\phi_b:E_b\rightarrow F_b, \quad \phi_b = \left.\phi\right|_{E_b}$, to get a bi-linear map, I suspect that we can use the same idea with which we define covariant derivative in the presence of connections. Especially that one could write a canonical isomorphism $T_{0(E_b)}E \cong \ker D\pi_E(0(E_b)) \oplus D0(b)(T_bB)$ and a similar decomposition for $F$. (Here $0$ is the zero section $B\rightarrow E$.)

$\endgroup$

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.