1
$\begingroup$

Let $y = e^{ix}$. Then $y'' = -y$, which is the equation for simple harmonic motion. The general solution is
$$y = A\cos(x) + B\sin(x) \tag1$$ where
$$y(0) = e^0 = 1 = A\cos(0) + B\sin(0) = A \tag2$$ so $A = 1$, and $$y'(0) = ie^0 = i = -A\sin(0) + B\cos(0) =B \tag3$$ so $B = i$, and that's pretty much it.

$\endgroup$
5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Hi, welcome to Math SE. I edited your question to use our preferred MathJax format. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 12:15
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ You‘d better use MathJax. And you’d better say what you’re talking about. Little things like which definitions you’re using, and what exactly you want to prove. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 12:21
  • $\begingroup$ If you imply anything known about $ \exp, \sin , \cos$ and second order ODEs , there is nothing to be shown. Your example is at best a confirmation for a special case of $x$, eg $x=(1+2i)^{-1/5}$ for the inverse functions of integrals of $1/x, 1/\sqrt{1-x^2} $ $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 12:29
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Here you are differentiating the complex exponential before having defined it, so the argument is circular. In effect, you are defining $x \mapsto e^{ix}$ to be a solution of the ODE $y^{\prime\prime} = -y$ and then checking that it does indeed solve that equation. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 13:06
  • $\begingroup$ What is your definition of $e^{ix}?$ $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 13:43

1 Answer 1

0
$\begingroup$

From what you have said, I can see at least one glaring issue, you assumed the solution to be $ y = e^{ix} $. But one can also see that $ y = e^{ix} + c $ is also a solution to the simple harmonic oscillator where $ c $ is an arbitrary constant. So, following the same procedure would lead you to believe that $ y(0)=1+c=A $. Then your process would lead that $ e^{ix} = B \sin(x) + (1+c) \cos(x) $. So, I do not think this qualifies as a valid proof.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ $$(\cos x +c)^{\prime \prime} = -\cos x \ne -(\cos x +c)$$ $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 12:37
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks for the correction, I am editing it right now. $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 12:38
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ $y = e^{ix} + c$ is still not a solution when $c\neq 0.$ $\endgroup$ Commented Nov 16 at 15:06

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.