2
$\begingroup$

let S = {1,2,3,4}

Explain why each of the below is not an equivalence relation.

{ (1,1), (1,2), (2,1), (2,2), (3,3) }

{ (1,1), (1,2), (2,3), (1,3), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4) }

{ (1,1), (2,2), (3,3), (4,4), (2,3), (3,2), (2,4), (4,2)}

I am having difficulty trying to understand the 3 condition

  1. Reflexive
  2. Symmetric
  3. Transitive

Would appreciate if anyone would to provide me with the guidance.

Thanks

$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ so do you mean that for 2nd set, (1,2) & (2,1) is not within the set and hence not symmetric? $\endgroup$ Commented May 11, 2014 at 8:50

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$
  1. The first one is surely not an equivalence relation as it is not reflective: $(4,4)$ does not belong, this is $4$~$4$ is false, this is $x$~$x$ for all $x$ is false.

  2. The second one is exactly as you wrote in your comment: $(1,2)$ belongs to the relation, $(2,1)$ does not, hence symmetric property fails.

  3. Third: we have the pairs $(3,2)$ and $(2,4)$, but not $(3,4)$. Hence is not true that
    $x$~$y\ \&\ y$~$z\ \Rightarrow\ x$~$z\quad \forall\,x,y,z$ (not transitive).

All cool about it? ;)

$\endgroup$
0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.