13

I appreciate the mechanisms which help bring attention to new answers to old questions - front page sorting, and the moderation tool explicitly designed for it. But I wonder if we can do more. I'm particularly interested in addressing answers whose validity has changed. In the worst case, they were correct when they were posted, but no longer are, so they mislead all the current users who find their way to them looking for an answer. More benignly, perhaps the best answer was good, but slightly flawed.

At this point, a helpful user may post a new answer, which is much better than existing upvoted and accepted answers. It can be difficult to overcome that momentum. What if the default sorting method took this into account? A naive suggestion: if a new answer has a large positive vote velocity, and an old answer has a negative vote velocity, perhaps the default sorting should place the new answer above the old answer. This could help make new answers visible to users who need a correct answer, and also help garner more votes to increase the confidence of the sorting decision.

I know this would be a fairly low-impact change, but nothing is permanent, and I'm afraid of answers with 100 upvotes being pinned at the top for years after they've become obsolete.

Edit: I would welcome other proposals that accomplish the same goal - my naive suggestion wasn't intended to be a complete solution, just one thing that a better sorting method would do.

8
  • Why not just edit the original, highly-upvoted answer? Commented Mar 13, 2012 at 4:30
  • 3
    @CodyGray Well, it seems odd to edit an answer if the edit changes it meaning 100%. E.g., stackoverflow.com/questions/1131781/… Commented Mar 13, 2012 at 4:34
  • 2
    @CodyGray: I'm for that if possible, but sometimes you may not be able to do anything but add a "no longer valid" note. It's definitely not a great idea to entirely rewrite an answer, leaving a large number of upvotes that were given to a different answer. Commented Mar 13, 2012 at 4:34
  • I think this is a good idea. But I think this is a better idea: blog.reddit.com/2009/10/reddits-new-comment-sorting-system.html Commented Mar 13, 2012 at 7:02
  • One should also take into account that new answers start at the bottom, and so get less views. This is a solution for: meta.stackexchange.com/questions/15805/… , and meta.stackexchange.com/questions/6662/… made a similar proposal. Commented Aug 13, 2015 at 5:24
  • Possible duplicate of Show most recent answers first in old questions Commented May 7, 2017 at 3:26
  • 2
    Possible duplicate of Fastest Gun in the West Problem Commented May 7, 2017 at 3:57
  • 1
    Do what y'all think is best, and I know this never attracted much attention anyway, but new answers to old questions are not exactly the same problem as competition among early answers, and the suggestion here was to try to make a sane decision, not just push new answers to the top. Commented May 7, 2017 at 4:04

0

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.