1
$\begingroup$

I have a question regarding possible ways to simulate realized variance (the sum of squared intraday returns) for testing different realized variance forecasting models.

I'm aware of several approaches to model stock prices, such as Geometric Brownian Motion and the Merton model. Recently, I was told that a simpler and more direct approach to simulate realized variance could involve using a HAR/AR model (for linear dependencies) something like this: $$ RV_{t+1} = \phi_{1} RV_{t} + \phi_{2} RV_{t-1}+ ... + \phi_n RV_{t-n} + \epsilon_{t}$$ with $\epsilon$ following some distribution.

Additionally, I was told that an exponential model could be used for simulating non-linear dependencies. The goal of this simulation study is to evaluate how different realized variance forecasting models perform under both linear and non-linear dependency assumptions. However, I’ve struggled to find much literature explaining this specific approach to simulating realized variance.

This is why I wanted to ask:

  1. How would you approach simulating realized variance for a simulation study
  2. What kind of exponential model would be most appropriate for capturing non-linear dependencies in realized variance?
  3. Can you recommend any literature that explores these or similar approaches?

Thanks a lot in advance!

$\endgroup$
6
  • $\begingroup$ In a simulation study, you get to decide what data generating process (DGP) to use. I would choose a DGP that I believe would best mimic the actual data that the models are going to be applied on. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 24, 2024 at 14:19
  • $\begingroup$ Thanks a lot! The models will be applied to stock data (AAPL, MSFT etc...) this is why I am unsure what DGP to use, especially since it seems that there is not a lot of literature using these direct models for realized variance simulation (AR model and/or exponential model and not GBM) (at least that I can find). $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 24, 2024 at 14:51
  • $\begingroup$ Cross-posted on Cross Validated here. Rodion, the practice of posting the same question on multiple Stack Exchange sites is frowned upon. On the other hand, it may be fine to do it with a week's delay if you get no good answers on your first attempt. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 25, 2024 at 6:58
  • $\begingroup$ Alright, understand! Thanks for the info. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 25, 2024 at 12:15
  • $\begingroup$ What Richard is right: find the DGP that best mimic actual data. One example of a "realistic" DGP for simulation studies regarding realized measures/models, is the 2-factor stochastic volatility model described in Appendix A of Bollerslev, Patton et al. (2016). This model is able to model the intraday volatility pattern as a diurnal U-shape through the $\sigma_{ut}$ function. The simulation procedure is also described in Huang and Tauchen (2005) along with alternative DGPs. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 28, 2024 at 22:14

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.