So I've been tinkering with Linq.Expressions (and if anyone can suggest a more proper or more elegant way to do what I'm doing please feel free to chime in) and have hit a wall in trying to do something.
Let's imagine we have a simple math class:
public class SimpleMath { public int AddNumbers(int number1, int number2) { return number1 + number2; } } I decide I want to convert our AddNumbers method to a simple Func<object, object, object> delegate.
To do this I do the following:
// Two collections, one for Type Object paramaters and one for converting to Type int. List<ParameterExpression> parameters = new List<ParameterExpression>(); List<Expression> convertedParameters = new List<Expression>(); // Populate collections with Parameter and conversion ParameterExpression parameter1 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object)); parameters.Add(parameter1); convertedParameters.Add(Expression.Convert(parameter1, typeof(int))); ParameterExpression parameter2 = Expression.Parameter(typeof(object)); parameters.Add(parameter2); convertedParameters.Add(Expression.Convert(parameter2, typeof(int))); // Create instance of SimpleMath SimpleMath simpleMath = new SimpleMath(); // Get the MethodInfo for the AddNumbers method MethodInfo addNumebrsMethodInfo = simpleMath.GetType().GetMethods().Where(x => x.Name == "AddNumbers").ToArray()[0]; // Create MethodCallExpression using the SimpleMath object, the MethodInfo of the method we want and the converted parameters MethodCallExpression returnMethodWithParameters = Expression.Call(Expression.Constant(simpleMath), addNumebrsMethodInfo, convertedParameters); // Convert the MethodCallExpression to return an Object rather than int UnaryExpression returnMethodWithParametersAsObject = Expression.Convert(returnMethodWithParameters, typeof(object)); // Create the Func<object, object, object> with our converted Expression and Parameters of Type Object Func<object, object, object> func = Expression.Lambda<Func<object, object, object>>(returnMethodWithParametersAsObject, parameters).Compile(); object result = func(20, 40); // result = 60 So if you run that code func should return simple calculations. However, it accepts parameters of Type Object, which obviously leaves it open to problems at runtime, for example:
object result1 = func(20, "f"); // Throws InvalidCastException So I want to wrap the method in a Try...Catch (obviously this exact problem would be picked up at compile time if we were dealing with a straight call to AddNumbers and passing a string as a parameter).
So to catch this exception I can do the following:
TryExpression tryCatchMethod = TryExpression.TryCatch(returnMethodWithParametersAsObject, Expression.Catch(typeof(InvalidCastException), Expression.Constant(55, typeof(object)))); Func<object, object, object> func = Expression.Lambda<Func<object, object, object>>(tryCatchMethod, parameters).Compile(); object result = func(20, "f"); // result = 55 The TryExpression.TryCatch takes an Expression body and then a collection of CatchBlock handlers. returnMethodWithParametersAsObject is the expression we wish to wrap, Expression.Catch defines that the Exception we want to catch is of Type InvalidCastException and its Expression body is a constant, 55.
So the exception is handled, but it's not much use unless I want to always return a static value when the exception is thrown. So returning to the SimpleMath class I add a new method HandleException:
public class SimpleMath { public int AddNumbers(int number1, int number2) { return number1 + number2; } public int HandleException() { return 100; } } And following the same process above I convert the new method to an Expression:
MethodInfo handleExceptionMethodInfo = simpleMath.GetType().GetMethods().Where(x => x.Name == "HandleException").ToArray()[0]; MethodCallExpression returnMethodWithParameters2 = Expression.Call(Expression.Constant(simpleMath), handleExceptionMethodInfo); UnaryExpression returnMethodWithParametersAsObject2 = Expression.Convert(returnMethodWithParameters2, typeof(object)); Then using it when creating the TryCatch block:
TryExpression tryCatchMethod2 = TryExpression.TryCatch(returnMethodWithParametersAsObject, Expression.Catch(typeof(InvalidCastException), returnMethodWithParametersAsObject2)); Func<object, object, object> func = Expression.Lambda<Func<object, object, object>>(tryCatchMethod2, parameters).Compile(); object result = func(20, "f"); // result = 100 So this time when the InvalidCastException is thrown the SimpleMath.HandleException method will be executed. So far so good, I can now execute some code when there is an exception.
My problem now is, in a normal inline Try...Catch block you actually have the exception object at your disposal. E.g.
try { // Do stuff that causes an exception } catch (InvalidCastException ex) { // Do stuff with InvalidCastException ex } I can execute code when an exception is thrown but I can't seem to figure out how to actually get my hands on the exception object like you would in a normal Try...Catch block.
Any help would be appreciated!
p.s. I know that you wouldn't actually organise anything in the way I've done above but I thought it was necessary for example purposes to show the mechanics of what I want to do.