Using C++ base class constructors?

Question

While working with templates I ran into a need to make a base class constructors accessible from inherited classes for object creation to decrease copy/paste operations. I was thinking to do this through using keyword in same manner with functions case, but that not work.

class A { public: A(int val) {} }; class B : public A { }; class C : public A { public: C(const string &val) {} }; class D : public A { public: D(const string &val) {} using A::A; // g++ error: A::A names constructor }; void main() { B b(10); // Ok. (A::A constructor is not overlapped) C c(10); // error: no matching function to call to 'C::C(int)' }

So my question: Is there any way to import a base class constructors after new ones in inherited class been declared?

Or there is only one alternative to declare new constructors and call a base ones from initializer list?

possible duplicate of How to use base class's constructors and assignment operator in C++? — Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com
– Ciro Santilli OurBigBook.com, Commented Apr 8, 2014 at 21:40

Serg Kryvonos · Accepted Answer · 2016-01-23 15:36:51Z

132

Yes, Since C++11:

struct B2 { B2(int = 13, int = 42); }; struct D2 : B2 { using B2::B2; // The set of inherited constructors is // 1. B2(const B2&) // 2. B2(B2&&) // 3. B2(int = 13, int = 42) // 4. B2(int = 13) // 5. B2() // D2 has the following constructors: // 1. D2() // 2. D2(const D2&) // 3. D2(D2&&) // 4. D2(int, int) <- inherited // 5. D2(int) <- inherited };

For additional information see http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/using_declaration

edited Jan 23, 2016 at 15:36

answered Apr 19, 2014 at 22:03

Serg Kryvonos

4,7863 gold badges46 silver badges57 bronze badges

Sign up to request clarification or add additional context in comments.

4 Comments

Charles Over a year ago

This is not working for me. I get a "No instance of constructor matches the argument list".

Serg Kryvonos Over a year ago

@charlesrockbass This means that your B2 has no constructor matches your argument list or the constructor is not in accessible visibility

Kartoffel Over a year ago

How would this syntax look if you have to specify namespace? For example with the following class: struct my_container : std::vector<int>{}

Serg Kryvonos Over a year ago

@Kartoffel, 1) using base=std::vector<int>; 2) using base::base;

justin · Accepted Answer · 2012-11-01 03:33:50Z

Prefer initialization:

class C : public A { public: C(const string &val) : A(anInt) {} };

In C++11, you can use inheriting constructors (which has the syntax seen in your example D).

Update: Inheriting Constructors have been available in GCC since version 4.8.

If you don't find initialization appealing (e.g. due to the number of possibilities in your actual case), then you might favor this approach for some TMP constructs:

class A { public: A() {} virtual ~A() {} void init(int) { std::cout << "A\n"; } }; class B : public A { public: B() : A() {} void init(int) { std::cout << "B\n"; } }; class C : public A { public: C() : A() {} void init(int) { std::cout << "C\n"; } }; class D : public A { public: D() : A() {} using A::init; void init(const std::string& s) { std::cout << "D -> " << s << "\n"; } }; int main() { B b; b.init(10); C c; c.init(10); D d; d.init(10); d.init("a"); return 0; }

Adding comment, because SO keeps suggesting it, I prefer using syntax, because it's way shorter in usual cases and seems way cleaner to me.

BЈовић · Accepted Answer · 2013-04-24 06:04:04Z

No, that's not how it is done. Normal way to initialize the base class is in the initialization list :

class A { public: A(int val) {} }; class B : public A { public: B( int v) : A( v ) { } }; void main() { B b(10); }

obmarg · Accepted Answer · 2011-11-11 12:42:31Z

You'll need to declare constructors in each of the derived classes, and then call the base class constructor from the initializer list:

class D : public A { public: D(const string &val) : A(0) {} D( int val ) : A( val ) {} }; D variable1( "Hello" ); D variable2( 10 );

C++11 allows you to use the using A::A syntax you use in your decleration of D, but C++11 features aren't supported by all compilers just now, so best to stick with the older C++ methods until this feature is implemented in all the compilers your code will be used with.

Are you sure it compiles? How is A initialized in the 1st constructor?

Zhang · Accepted Answer · 2022-05-25 02:30:18Z

class A { public: A(int val) {} A(string name) {} }; class B : public A { using A::A; };

Addition to other answers, in case there are several constuctors with the base class, and you just want to inherit some of them, you can delete the unwanted.

 class B : public A { using A::A; B(string) = delete; };

Community · Accepted Answer · 2017-05-23 10:31:27Z

Here is a good discussion about superclass constructor calling rules. You always want the base class constructor to be called before the derived class constructor in order to form an object properly. Which is why this form is used

 B( int v) : A( v ) { }

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

Using C++ base class constructors?

6 Answers 6

4 Comments

1 Comment

Comments

2 Comments

Comments

Comments

Linked

Hot Network Questions

Collectives™ on Stack Overflow

6 Answers 6

4 Comments

1 Comment

Comments

2 Comments

Comments

Comments

Linked

Related