I am currently working on a paper which heavily uses \tilde for both lower case letters and capitals in math bold font.
When using \tilde for lower case letters, everything looks perfectly fine, but \tilde{\mathbf{X}} looks a little silly because the symbol is so out of proportion relative to the symbol below it. My solution to this has been to use \widetilde only for capitals instead, but I am concerned about consistency and any personal bias on the aesthetics of tiny tildes over large symbols.
To me, the problem is twofold:
If I use
\widetilde, I am essentially using two different symbols,\tildeand\widetildeto mean the same thing.When
\widetildeis used inside a line of text, it disrupts the spacing (in a very minor way) unless I override that behavior. This would also be inconsistent with the way I've written to avoid any disruption of line spacing by things such as using\displaystylefor my in-text limits and summations.
At this time, I think the best solutions are to either just use a tiny tilde for everything; only use \widetilde in the math environment for capitals and \tilde in-text; or suppress the added spacing because most readers will never notice the difference and this is a somewhat pedantic detail anyway (Is messing with ``vertical kerning'' a big deal?).
I would appreciate any suggestions.
