0

I'm in the process of upgrading my desktop/server setup and am considering using POWER9 architecture.

However, I'm a bit concerned about the level of support it receives from GNU/Linux distributions and applications.

Can anyone provide insights on how well supported POWER9 is within the GNU/Linux ecosystem in 2024?

Any advice or recommendations would be greatly appreciated!

3
  • I could have sworn Debian usually keeps application support per architecture but I cannot find it for the life of me. Commented Sep 26, 2024 at 16:24
  • Does this answer your question? Commented Sep 26, 2024 at 16:40
  • As for debian ... wiki.debian.org/ppc64el Commented Sep 26, 2024 at 16:51

1 Answer 1

2

It’s quite well supported, and has been for years, on IBM POWER systems as well as workstations using motherboards produced by Raptor or Tyan for example. Debian (ppc64el) and Fedora (PPC64LE) installation images are available. RHEL is also available, and a number of systems from Hitachi, IBM, and Inspur are certified with that distribution.

Packages provided with the distribution should work fine; since the switch from big-endian to little-endian, you won’t run into endianness issues. Third-party support is less certain, especially for anything that can’t be rebuilt from source — the systems are fast enough to run x86 binaries using emulation, but that’s not ideal.

Performance is great, at least on the IBM systems I’ve used (in a logical partition). The cost/performance ratio however doesn’t compare favourably with x86 or ARM systems but I imagine you’re aware of that.

Whether all that qualifies POWER9 for “end-user usage” depends on the end-user in question — I don’t think the servers are usable by most end-users, and even POWER9 workstations aren’t quite like PCs, with two-stage BMC-based boots on Tanos II for example.

0

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.