Skip to content

Enhance transpilation support for member visibility and data exchange operations#516

Open
PTKu wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
ixc-should-transpile-protected-and-internal-members
Open

Enhance transpilation support for member visibility and data exchange operations#516
PTKu wants to merge 1 commit intodevfrom
ixc-should-transpile-protected-and-internal-members

Conversation

@PTKu
Copy link
Contributor

@PTKu PTKu commented Mar 25, 2026

  • Updated documentation to clarify that public, protected, and internal members are now supported in transpilation.
  • Adjusted data exchange logic to ensure only public members participate in operations like OnlineToPlain and PlainToOnline.
  • Refactored eligibility checks in the code to include protected and internal members for transpilation but exclude them from data exchange.
  • Updated generated code to reflect changes in member visibility handling.
… operations - Updated documentation to clarify that `public`, `protected`, and `internal` members are now supported in transpilation. - Adjusted data exchange logic to ensure only `public` members participate in operations like `OnlineToPlain` and `PlainToOnline`. - Refactored eligibility checks in the code to include `protected` and `internal` members for transpilation but exclude them from data exchange. - Updated generated code to reflect changes in member visibility handling.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant