Skip to content

feat: Add reset method to ServiceLocator#1759

Draft
Pijukatel wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
add-reset-to-service-locator
Draft

feat: Add reset method to ServiceLocator#1759
Pijukatel wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
add-reset-to-service-locator

Conversation

@Pijukatel
Copy link
Collaborator

Description

  • Add reset method to service locator to better support tests and multiple Actor(...) initialization scenarios

Issues

Testing

  • Added unit test

Checklist

  • CI passed
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the 134th sprint - Tooling team milestone Feb 19, 2026
@github-actions github-actions bot added t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics. labels Feb 19, 2026
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 92.26%. Comparing base (7663404) to head (54d9a17).
⚠️ Report is 35 commits behind head on master.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #1759 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 92.31% 92.26% -0.06%  ========================================== Files 156 156 Lines 10644 10648 +4 ========================================== - Hits 9826 9824 -2  - Misses 818 824 +6 
Flag Coverage Δ
unit 92.26% <100.00%> (-0.06%) ⬇️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

t-tooling Issues with this label are in the ownership of the tooling team. tested Temporary label used only programatically for some analytics.

2 participants