Skip to main content

You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.

We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.

Required fields*

5
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Vladimir Is it possible you could show an example of such a picture with a "non flat glow" (a "physically accurate" fantasy glow)? I still think the compositor is the way to go, as you have the most control there.. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 18:48
  • $\begingroup$ By "fantasy", I meant a glow that does not exist in the real world (Cegaton's example is a glow that occurs in real world, I think). By flat, I meant a glow that has depth like the image above in my post. The compositor deals with pixels. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 18:57
  • $\begingroup$ @Gandalf3 And by "physically accurate" I meant the glow to have depth (not to be 2d, but 3d). I could just say "3d", but that's the word that came to my mind. The compositor, as we all know it, deals with images, which will make a glow that is out of perspective. That's why I posted the image above (the first one). $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 19:28
  • $\begingroup$ @Vladimir If by "3D blur" you mean a glow which gets smaller in the distance, even though the brightness of the light source remains the same, I'm not sure thats "psychically accurate" in terms of lens blooms.. $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 19:54
  • $\begingroup$ Well, yeah but, what is some approach to create a glow effect other then composting (if there's any)? $\endgroup$ Commented Sep 9, 2014 at 20:06