64
\$\begingroup\$

This might be a very simple challenge, but I am surprised it hasn't been done on code-golf yet:

Print all Integers from 1 to 10 inclusive in ascending order to standard output.

Your output format can be whatever your language supports. This includes arbitrary separators (commas, semicolons, newlines, combinations of those, etc., but no digits), and prefixes and postfixes (like [...]). However, you may not output any other numbers than 1 through 10. Your program may not take any input. Standard loopholes are disallowed.

This is , so shortest answer in bytes wins!

Leaderboard

var QUESTION_ID=86075,OVERRIDE_USER=42570;function answersUrl(e){return"https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/questions/"+QUESTION_ID+"/answers?page="+e+"&pagesize=100&order=desc&sort=creation&site=codegolf&filter="+ANSWER_FILTER}function commentUrl(e,s){return"https://api.stackexchange.com/2.2/answers/"+s.join(";")+"/comments?page="+e+"&pagesize=100&order=desc&sort=creation&site=codegolf&filter="+COMMENT_FILTER}function getAnswers(){jQuery.ajax({url:answersUrl(answer_page++),method:"get",dataType:"jsonp",crossDomain:!0,success:function(e){answers.push.apply(answers,e.items),answers_hash=[],answer_ids=[],e.items.forEach(function(e){e.comments=[];var s=+e.share_link.match(/\d+/);answer_ids.push(s),answers_hash[s]=e}),e.has_more||(more_answers=!1),comment_page=1,getComments()}})}function getComments(){jQuery.ajax({url:commentUrl(comment_page++,answer_ids),method:"get",dataType:"jsonp",crossDomain:!0,success:function(e){e.items.forEach(function(e){e.owner.user_id===OVERRIDE_USER&&answers_hash[e.post_id].comments.push(e)}),e.has_more?getComments():more_answers?getAnswers():process()}})}function getAuthorName(e){return e.owner.display_name}function process(){var e=[];answers.forEach(function(s){var r=s.body;s.comments.forEach(function(e){OVERRIDE_REG.test(e.body)&&(r="<h1>"+e.body.replace(OVERRIDE_REG,"")+"</h1>")});var a=r.match(SCORE_REG);a&&e.push({user:getAuthorName(s),size:+a[2],language:a[1],link:s.share_link})}),e.sort(function(e,s){var r=e.size,a=s.size;return r-a});var s={},r=1,a=null,n=1;e.forEach(function(e){e.size!=a&&(n=r),a=e.size,++r;var t=jQuery("#answer-template").html();t=t.replace("{{PLACE}}",n+".").replace("{{NAME}}",e.user).replace("{{LANGUAGE}}",e.language).replace("{{SIZE}}",e.size).replace("{{LINK}}",e.link),t=jQuery(t),jQuery("#answers").append(t);var o=e.language;/<a/.test(o)&&(o=jQuery(o).text()),s[o]=s[o]||{lang:e.language,user:e.user,size:e.size,link:e.link}});var t=[];for(var o in s)s.hasOwnProperty(o)&&t.push(s[o]);t.sort(function(e,s){return e.lang>s.lang?1:e.lang<s.lang?-1:0});for(var c=0;c<t.length;++c){var i=jQuery("#language-template").html(),o=t[c];i=i.replace("{{LANGUAGE}}",o.lang).replace("{{NAME}}",o.user).replace("{{SIZE}}",o.size).replace("{{LINK}}",o.link),i=jQuery(i),jQuery("#languages").append(i)}}var ANSWER_FILTER="!t)IWYnsLAZle2tQ3KqrVveCRJfxcRLe",COMMENT_FILTER="!)Q2B_A2kjfAiU78X(md6BoYk",answers=[],answers_hash,answer_ids,answer_page=1,more_answers=!0,comment_page;getAnswers();var SCORE_REG=/<h\d>\s*([^\n,]*[^\s,]),.*?(\d+)(?=[^\n\d<>]*(?:<(?:s>[^\n<>]*<\/s>|[^\n<>]+>)[^\n\d<>]*)*<\/h\d>)/,OVERRIDE_REG=/^Override\s*header:\s*/i;
body{text-align:left!important}#answer-list,#language-list{padding:10px;width:290px;float:left}table thead{font-weight:700}table td{padding:5px}
<script src="https://ajax.googleapis.com/ajax/libs/jquery/2.1.1/jquery.min.js"></script> <link rel="stylesheet" type="text/css" href="//cdn.sstatic.net/codegolf/all.css?v=83c949450c8b"> <div id="answer-list"> <h2>Leaderboard</h2> <table class="answer-list"> <thead> <tr><td></td><td>Author</td><td>Language</td><td>Size</td></tr></thead> <tbody id="answers"> </tbody> </table> </div><div id="language-list"> <h2>Winners by Language</h2> <table class="language-list"> <thead> <tr><td>Language</td><td>User</td><td>Score</td></tr></thead> <tbody id="languages"> </tbody> </table> </div><table style="display: none"> <tbody id="answer-template"> <tr><td>{{PLACE}}</td><td>{{NAME}}</td><td>{{LANGUAGE}}</td><td>{{SIZE}}</td><td><a href="{{LINK}}">Link</a></td></tr></tbody> </table> <table style="display: none"> <tbody id="language-template"> <tr><td>{{LANGUAGE}}</td><td>{{NAME}}</td><td>{{SIZE}}</td><td><a href="{{LINK}}">Link</a></td></tr></tbody> </table>

Improve this question
\$\endgroup\$
17
  • 10
    \$\begingroup\$ Related (duplicate?) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 9:07
  • 17
    \$\begingroup\$ If the only change is hard-coding a single parameter then that falls under the banner of "trivial change", and by the standards of this site still counts as a dupe. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 9:54
  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ @PeterTaylor The other challenge has a huge problem with the integer limits though. The way it's specified every TC language that doesn't have 64-bit integers needs to implement them. (And that affects quite a lot of languages.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 10:01
  • 21
    \$\begingroup\$ @xnor Quite frankly, I'd rather close the other challenge as a duplicate of this one. The requirement pretty much ruins it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 21, 2016 at 14:09
  • 11
    \$\begingroup\$ I can't believe every single of the (currently) 71 answers assumes the base should be decimal… \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jul 22, 2016 at 15:05

284 Answers 284

Reset to default
1 2 3
4
5
…
10
2
\$\begingroup\$

Commercial, 649 bytes

A now 1 dollar off! B now 1 dollar off! A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B A has been selling out worldwide! A: made by the makers of B

Try it online!

I tried to do this in a loop, but Jumps in Commercial are weird and I couldn't get it to work properly

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Fortran 95, 32 bytes

It was the only language I know that was not used yet :P

program o print*,(i,i=1,10) end
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Kotlin, 16 bytes

print((1..9)+10)

Beautified

print((1..9)+10)

Test

fun f() = print((1..9)+10) fun main(args: Array<String>) { f() }

TIO

TryItOnline

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

brainfuck, 53 bytes

++++++++++[->+++++>+>+<<<]>-->-[-<+.>>.<]<--------.-.

Try it online!

Explanation :

++++++++++ # set initial counter to ten [->+++++>+>+<<<] # creates ascii cell, second counter, and newline >-->- # fixes ascii and counter cell values [-<+.>>.<] # prints digits one through nine <--------.-. # prints the ten

Output:

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ It's not really different enough from the previous answer for me to upvote, but I appreciate the explanation. Also, this answer is much shorter \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 21, 2018 at 3:49
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ And welcome to PPCG! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 21, 2018 at 3:56
2
\$\begingroup\$

Keg, 12 bytes

1(91+|:. ,1+

Output is separated by spaces

How it works

1 Pushes 1 ( Begins for loop 91+| For loop will run 10 times :. Output the top element of the stack , Output space 1+ Add one to the top element of the stack End bracket gets added automaticly

Try it Online!

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
10
  • \$\begingroup\$ I am working on supporting \ in loop conditions as in this (1 byte less) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 10, 2019 at 13:54
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh yeah, I did try that and was wondering why that wasn't working, but I just compromised with 91+ \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 10, 2019 at 13:57
  • \$\begingroup\$ That isn't working because you can't escape a character in a for loop repetition indicator. If you read the implementation, you will find that the escaping character is simply skipped. (I just created a PR for it. JonoCode9374 will probably merge it.) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 10, 2019 at 14:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ Whoops, there is an issue in my source code that makes it in fact 2 bytes less. (A 1-to-10-printing program written using 10 bytes!) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 10, 2019 at 14:05
  • \$\begingroup\$ Should we create a Keg chatroom to discuss new features and golfing? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Aug 10, 2019 at 14:31
2
\$\begingroup\$

Clojure REPL, 12 bytes

(range 1 11)

I think this is self explanatory code

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Hello and welcome to PPCG. The challenge asks for a program to output to stdout, meaning you either need to add println or potentially declare your language as "Clojure REPL" per standard rules. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 17, 2019 at 7:25
  • \$\begingroup\$ Oh I see, thank you \$\endgroup\$ Commented Sep 18, 2019 at 1:30
2
\$\begingroup\$

Turing Machine Language, 199 bytes

0 * 1 r 1 1 _ _ r 2 2 * 2 r 3 3 _ _ r 4 4 * 3 r 5 5 _ _ r 6 6 * 4 r 7 7 _ _ r 8 8 * 5 r 9 9 _ _ r a a * 6 r b b _ _ r c c * 7 r d d _ _ r e e * 8 r f f _ _ r g g * 9 r h h _ _ r i i * 1 r j j * 0 r k

Try it online!

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Putt, 2 bytes

X: 
X # Roman Numeral for 10 : # Ranger operator pushes [1..N] # Putt implicitly prints
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Hexadecimal Stacking Pseudo-Assembly Language, 54 bytes

203039400000120000201A8540000012000020000A400000120000

Try it online!

203039 input 0x3039 (decimal 12345) 400000 push that on stack 120000 print it 201A85 input 0x1A85 (decimal 6789) 400000 push that on stack 120000 print it 20000A input 0xA (decimal 10) 400000 push that on stack 120000 print it
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

BrainFuck, 41 Bytes

-[----->+>+<<]>---<++++[->+.+.<]>+.>--.-.

Output

12345678910

Try it online

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

naz, 50 bytes

1x1f1a1o2x1v0m9a1a1o1v0x1f1f1f1f1f1f1f1f1f8s1o1s1o

Explanation (with 0x commands removed)

1x1f # Function 1 1a1o # Add 1 to the register and output 2x1v # Store the new value in variable 1 0m9a1a1o # Output a newline 1v # Read variable 1 into the register 1f1f1f1f1f1f1f1f1f # Call function 1 nine times 8s1o # Subtract 8 and output 1s1o # Subtract 1 and output
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Commodore BASIC, method 1 (28 bytes)

0?1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10

Method 2 (27 26 bytes)

0FORI=1TO10:?I:NEXT

Method 3 (40 39 bytes)

0I=1 1?I:I=I+1:IFI<11THEN1

Method 4 (32 31 bytes)

0?I:I=I+1:IFI<11THEN0 I=1:GOTO0

Method 5 (20 bytes)

0?"12345678910

Method 6 (25 bytes) CBM BASIC V2 only [C64/C64Mini or VIC-20]

0I=I+1:?I:ON-(I<10)GOTO

I'm working out the memory used with ? 38911-(fre(0)-65536*(fre(0)<0)) on a Commodore 64.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

W, 2 bytes

Tk

Constant 10, then range from 1 to that. Added for completeness.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Flurry, 38 bytes

<({<({})({}){}>}){}>{(<><<>()>{})}({})

Verification

$ ./flurry -inn -c "<({<({})({}){}>}){}>{(<><<>()>{})}({})" 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

Since multiplication and exponentiation is much cheaper than increment, addition, and high number literals, 9 (being 3**2 or 3*3) is much cheaper to produce than 10. Since producing 1 is almost free (via popping from empty stack), I push a 1 manually and then loop 9 times to push 2 through 10. Then the stack is printed in integer mode, from bottom to top.

<({<({})({}){}>}){}> Number 9 <...> Function composition (multiply numbers) (...) Push and return the number inside... {<({})({}){}>} The number literal 3 {} Pop 3 back evaluates to 3 * 3 = 9 {(<><<>()>{})} Lambda function: Increment, push and return {...} Lambda, which implicitly pushes its argument (...) Push and return the result of... <><<>()> Increment {} the argument ({}) Initial value 1, pushed to the stack The entire program is roughly 9 (\x. push (succ x)) (push 1)
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Grok, 13 bytes

}q {p1+YzP9>!
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Vyxal, 2 bytes

₀ɾ

Try it Online!

Explanation:

₀ # 10 ɾ # Range [1, N] # Implicit output
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

BRASCA, 9 bytes

1lr,[nlo]

Try it!

Explanation

1lr - Push range(1,10) to the stack , - Reverse the stack [ ] - While the stack isnt empty: n - Output the next number... lo - and a newline!
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

CSASM v2.4.0.2, 43 bytes

func main: push [1..10] conv ~arr print ret end

Prints [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] to the console.

Explanation:

func main: ; Push a Range push [1..10] ; Convert it to an array: [1..10] -> [ 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 ] conv ~arr ; Print the CSASM representation of that array print ret end end

If the output had to only be the numbers 1 through 10, that would be this 72 byte program:

func main: lda 1 .lbl a push $a print.n inc $a push 11 push $a sub brtrue a ret end

Explanation:

func main: ; Store 1 into $a lda 1 .lbl a ; Print $a push $a print.n ; Stop looping if 11 - ++$a == 0 inc $a push 11 push $a sub brtrue a ret end ```
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Hexagony, 16 bytes

9{$:':</)!'/>;}}

Try it online!

Expanded:

 9 { $ : ' : < / ) ! ' / > ; } } . . .

Admittedly, this solution feels a bit questionable. Its output is

123456789	10

This is each number from 1 to 10, separated by the Unicode characters of their values. So, for example, 9 and 10 are separated by tab, which is Unicode character 9. Technically the problem doesn't specify that all the separators must be the same, though perhaps its implied. If you feel this is invalid, here's a 17 byte version that uses lowercase e as a separator (nothing special about e, it can be any character that isn't a special character in Hexagony).

9{.e:'<)!'://}};>

Here's another 17 byte alternate that prints the numbers separated by newlines, but never terminates (it prints 1 to 10 and then runs forever without printing anything else).

_10<>-<{)!'//=;{>

I'll just explain the 16 byte code because the others are just minor variations on it. Starting in the top left and moving right, 9}$ writes nine into a memory slot, then moves to an adjacent memory slot, and uses $ to jump into the main loop on line 3. The main loop starts with )!, which increments the value in the current memory slot and then prints its decimal value. This cell will cycle through the values 1 to 10, printing each. Then, ': backs up to a new memory slot and divides 9 by the number that was just printed. Because Hexagony uses integer division, the result will be one as long as the number is less than or equal to 9, and 0 once its greater. This gives a termination condition, as another ': backs into an empty slot and divides 0 by this number. As long as this value as 1 this calculation will be inconsequential, but when it equals zero, the program will crash trying to divide by zero. After this, }}; moves back to the incrementing memory slot, prints it as a Unicode value, and then reenters the main loop.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ Welcome to Code Golf, and nice first answer! IMO "Your output format can be whatever your language supports. This includes arbitrary separators" means that this format is perfectly acceptable, but if you're really concerned, you can leave a comment below the question asking once you've reached 50 reputation. I've edited your answer to include the unprintable characters \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 26, 2021 at 19:44
  • \$\begingroup\$ @cairdcoinheringaahing Ah cool, thanks! \$\endgroup\$ Commented Apr 26, 2021 at 19:48
2
\$\begingroup\$

Knight, 16 bytes

;=w 0W>10wO=w+1w

Try it online!

# set w to 0 ; = w 0 # loop while w < 10 : WHILE > 10 w # Output ++w : OUTPUT (= w + 1 w)
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Japt, 2 bytes

Aõ

Test it

Aõ A :10 õ :Range [1,A]
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

dotcomma, 67 bytes

[[[[[[[[[[.,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,]

The shortest is the direct approach: Put a 1 on queue and then, nine times put the previous value plus 1 on the queue. Output implicitly.

<script src="https://combinatronics.com/Radvylf/dotcomma/master/interpreter.js"></script><script src="https://code.jquery.com/jquery-3.5.1.min.js"></script><script>$(document).ready(function () {$("#btnInterpret").click(function () {$("#txtResult").text(interpret($("#txtCode").val(), $("#txtInput").val(), $("#lstOutputAs").children("option:selected").val()));});});</script><style>.textBox {background-color: white;border: 1px solid black;font-family: Courier New, Courier, monospace;width: 100%;}</style>Code: <textarea id="txtCode" type="text" class="textBox" style="height: 200px">[[[[[[[[[[.,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,][.].,]</textarea><br />Input: <textarea id="txtInput" type="text" class="textBox"></textarea><br /><input id="btnInterpret" type="button" value="Run" />Output as: <select id="lstOutputAs"><option value="">Number array</option><option value="true">String</option></select><br />Result:<br /><div id="txtResult" class="textBox" style="overflow-wrap: break-word"></div>

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Swift 5.6, 18 bytes

print([_](1...10))

SwiftFiddle link, since TIO uses Swift 5.0.

Same method as this Swift 3 answer, but using a new syntax for type inference. [Int] is short for Array<Int>, and Array<_> means "an array, but infer the element type" (mostly the same as just Array). Therefore, [_] is short for Array. Go figure.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Cognate, 16 bytes

Print Range 1 11

Attempt This Online!

Pretty self-explanatory, but here's a fuller version:

Print the Range of numbers from 1 up to but not including 11

(Lowercase words are treated as comments.)

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

Regenerate -a, 8 bytes

[1-9]|10

Attempt This Online!

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
0
2
\$\begingroup\$

Java, 47 bytes

()->{for(int i=0;i++<10;System.out.print(i));};

Ungolfed test program

public static void main(String[] args) { Runnable r = () -> { for (int i = 0; i++ < 10; System.out.print(i)); }; r.run(); }

36 bytes + imports

()->IntStream.range(0,11).toArray();

Doesn't include imports :(

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

J-uby, 4 bytes

10.+

In J-uby, n.+ is the same as [*1..n].

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ So, what is J-uby? Is it like Ruby's analog of Pyth, combined with J or something like that? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 19, 2017 at 20:41
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ZacharyT it's not like pyth. J-uby is an extension of ruby that gives it concise fictional programming features in the style of J. I'm now adding other methods as aliases to make it more suitable for code golfing. The most important principle is that any valid Ruby code is valid J-uby code. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 19, 2017 at 20:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ (It's not fictional, it's functional). So it's just somewhat like the Babel ES6 transpiler, in the fact that it converts J-uby code to Ruby? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 19, 2017 at 20:47
  • \$\begingroup\$ @ZacharyT auto correct is annoying. And since Ruby is awesome, you can just require 'juby' and then it is a j-uby program through metaprogramming. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 19, 2017 at 20:52
  • \$\begingroup\$ Yeah, I love how you used Ruby's wacky language features to enhance it. I wonder what someone could do with Perl this way, considering you can define new operators? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 19, 2017 at 21:02
2
\$\begingroup\$

Pushy, 3 bytes

TR_

It's extremely simple:

T % Push 10 R % Generate range (1 to 10, including both endpoints) _ % Output representation of stack (1 2 3 4 5..)
Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

shell commands, 7 bytes

seq 10

or also

jot 10

Thanks.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Which shell? with coreutils? \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 11, 2024 at 5:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ Hello @qwr Those are external tools. GNU Core Utils provides seq since 1.13 shell utilities release ; but it's available under other Unixes too. In fact, it appeared in Version 8 AT&T UNIX first, then NetBSD 3.0, and was ported to FreeBSD 9.0. It's also part of the native Win32 ports. (to be followed) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 14, 2024 at 10:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ (continuation) The alternative jot first appeared in 4.2BSD and is available under most GNU/Linux too as specific package: athena-jot for Debian based, outils-jot for Alpine.. It's fancier than seq, and all implementations share the same options. (end) \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 14, 2024 at 11:10
2
\$\begingroup\$

Nibbles, 1.5 bytes (3 nibbles)

,10

Program saved on disk conists of the 3 hex nibbles d1f:
d = , literal code = range 1..
1 = encode integer
f = integer value 10

enter image description here

Note that Nibbles appends a 6-nibble, not part of the program code, to pad the saved file to a whole number of bytes.

Improve this answer
\$\endgroup\$
1 2 3
4
5
…
10

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.