Thank you group - 141/155

My assignment marks breakup is -
The maximum possible # of points is 155; the minimum to pass is 124.
General Considerations(maximum = 58): 51 Documentation(maximum = 20): 20
GUI(maximum = 24): 21
Server(maximum = 53): 49
I am very much thankful to this wonderful group who helped me way to success.

Excellent job Shivaji. What's next on your agenda.

Congratulations ! Great show

Congrats Shivaji, What do you plan on next? And tell us a little about your design.
Mark

Hi Gregory,
In my skillsets I am weak in Databases, so planning to learn basic database techniques. Already started reading reviews of Oracle 9i.
Thanx.

Hi Shivaji,
Congratulations on passing the exam. Well, I also took the exam on the 1st of Feb, but haven't received it as yet.
could you please tell when you uploaded the assignment and took the essay exam.
Still waiting for my result.
Garry

Hi Garry,
I gave essay exam on 4th & nearly 5-6 days before I uploaded the assignment.

Congratulation!! Shivaji.
-Bal

Hi Mark,
I have extended Data class. Used RMI. At server I had pooling of integer objects to identify client connection.
At client as usual Observer pattern for implementing Model View architecture for JTable & JComboBox. Factory for 2 distinct modes. Command pattern for Menu events.
This was all about.

was that 4th of feb or jan.
Garry

Hi Garry,
It was 4th Feb.

Congrates Shivaji !!
Good Score
I have one doubt regarding the lock/unlock,
as u said, u are using the pool of integer to identify client, could u please elaborate this, did u change signature of the lock and unlock method ?
i am using the client ip address as client id, which i take at lock/unlock method call on rmi server RemoteServer.getClientHost(), but in my case client can not have more than one connection with server from a single machine. will that be acceptable? is there any other way out?
suggestions are most welcome
Rana :roll:

Originally posted by Rana:
Congrates Shivaji !!
u are using the pool of integer to identify client, could u please elaborate this, did u change signature of the lock and unlock method ?

Yes I changed signatures of lock,modify & unlock method. Let me elaborate, while client gives a call for a lock on a record, at the return of it, client is assigned with integer id. The same id is used in further call to modify & unlock.

i am using the client ip address as client id, which i take at lock/unlock method call on rmi server RemoteServer.getClientHost(), but in my case client can not have more than one connection with server from a single machine. will that be acceptable? is there any other way out?

I dont find any potential threat by letting only one appn communicating with RMI server from a machine. You can mention this in your design docs.
In my case I had similar prob, where my design employed, the machine at which RMI server is running cannot have distributed client for that same RMI server. It is accepted by them.

Thanks Shivaji,
Thats sounds good !!
I will work it out, and try to avoid the signature change, i think it is possible.

bye
Rana