1
$\begingroup$

I have a question about the expression of the output of a discrete time filter described by its impulse response $h(k)$. Looking at the defintion of a discrete filter with input $u(k)$ and output $y(k)$, if holds:

$$y(k) = h(k) * u(k) = \sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}h(n)u(k-n) = \sum_{n\in\mathbb{Z}}h(k-n)u(n) $$

I agree with these definitions but in several examples I found on different forums and in lab exercices, when $h(k)$ is a causal filter, it is possible to go from the infinite sum above to the following definition :

$$y(k) = \sum_{n = 0} ^kh(n)u(k-n) $$

I get it that $h(k)=0$ for $k<0$, so we can start the sum at $n=0$, but why not until $n=+\infty$ ?

Improve this question
$\endgroup$
1
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ this formula only applies if BOTH the signal and the impulse response are causal. $\endgroup$ Commented Oct 25, 2021 at 10:08

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

When the system is causal, i.e., $h[n]=0$ for $n<0$, the sum starts at $0$ and goes to infinity, as you said. The upper limit of the sum becomes the current time index only if also the input signal vanishes for negative time indices, because then $x[k-n]=0$ for $n>k$.

Improve this answer
$\endgroup$

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.