7
\$\begingroup\$

I'm having trouble with shipping an electronic enclosure. During the transport the wires get loose from the screw terminals of the PCB due to vibrations. 22 AWG stranded wires and the terminals is here.

enter image description here

Is there a practical way to secure and reduce such possibility rather then giving a lot of torque? Such as glue epoxy etc?

\$\endgroup\$
17
  • 4
    \$\begingroup\$ You could use anti-tamper paint (nail varnish) Or use a screw connector with a better locking design - some are simple screws pressing on springs, some are clamps. Also consider using ferrules on the wire ends and a consistent tightening torque. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 18 at 10:00
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sow how did you terminate those wires? Are they multi-strand wires, just peeled from insulation and shoved under a screw terminal? What kind of screw terminal it is, has it got just a bare screw or some more fancy "elevator clamp" style? If you tell your current setup, there might be many ways to improve it. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 18 at 10:15
  • 3
    \$\begingroup\$ In general this shouldn't happen so you should investigate this further. Common problems include: placing the wire above the "elevator" rather than inside it, securing the cable to the isolation rather than the exposed wire, stripping too much of the wire, buying cheap Chinaware terminals. More pictures with better resolution are required if you want anyone here to have a chance of answering. \$\endgroup\$ Commented 2 days ago
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ Fwiw, @op, automation blocks with hundreds or thousands of these terms shipped by truck routinely... so something is going wrong \$\endgroup\$ Commented 2 days ago
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Careful the tightening torque for this connector is only 0.22 Nm ~ 0.25 Nm \$\endgroup\$ Commented 2 days ago

3 Answers 3

12
\$\begingroup\$

I experienced a similar problem. It seems that trying to compress a bundle of stranded wire in a screw terminal is less than ideal, as the wires spread about and can have high spots where they cross.

I found that they make ferrules for terminating wire ends. They work better because crimping the metal tube captures all the strands and holds them tight. Then the screw terminal only needs to hold the crimped tube.

Sample images taken from Adafruit

Ferrule, uncrimped and crimped.

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry I noticed the link to the pcb mount terminal connector was wrong. I now updated it in question. It is also here: lcsc.com/datasheet/C2838108.pdf \$\endgroup\$ Commented yesterday
9
\$\begingroup\$

The screw terminal's job is only to make a contact, not to fasten the wires and prevent them from flapping around... With vibration, if you don't use some form of strain relief, the wire can either break or get loose.

So... you need to clamp the wires to something, preferably to the PCB since that makes it much easier to take it out of the enclosure without having to disconnect everything. It can be as simple as two holes in the PCB to thread a ziptie through and hold the wires, or a PCB mounted cable clamp...

Random example:

enter image description here

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • 2
    \$\begingroup\$ While this is good practice, this doesn't explain the problem and strain relief should arguably not be needed just for transport purposes. I use these kind of terminals without strain relief all the time in nasty shock/vibration environments such as pile drivers or stone crushers. If there is no good mechanic connection with the terminal, then there will be no good electric connection either and you'd risk oxidation. \$\endgroup\$ Commented 2 days ago
6
\$\begingroup\$

Is there a practical way to secure and reduce such possibility rather then giving a lot of torque?

Ideally you should be tightening those terminals using a torque-controlled screwdriver, per the torque given in the datasheet of the terminal block. That's the starting point to this discussion. Only if that fails you'd be justified in looking for other solutions.

It's hard to be sure that you have tightened those terminals sufficiently unless you use a proper tool.

The terminal blocks themselves must be designed to accept stranded wire. Not all are. The datasheet should specify whether only solid wire or a ferrule is acceptable, or is ferrule-less stranded wire OK as well.

The wire size (AWG or cross-sectional area) must fall within the acceptable wire size for the terminal block. Note that this size range may be different for solid and stranded wire.

So I would say that if the wire gets loose in spite of you using correct torque and correct wire type and size for the terminals, then you should talk to the terminal block manufacturer's customer support, as it would indicate it's a problem with their product. It's IMHO more likely that you're using insufficient (or excessive!) torque, or not a wire type/size that the terminal is rated for.

Most terminal blocks are rated for negligible wire loads, i.e. the wire should be exerting almost no force on the terminal block. If you have long runs of unsupported wire, the inertial forces will exceed what the terminal block was designed for, and the wires may get loose.

You should do an in-house pull-out force test for your terminals to get an idea of what sort of static pulling force the terminals support. The repetitive/cyclic pulling force that's allowed will be much lower than that.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Sorry I noticed the link to the pcb mount terminal connector was wrong. I now updated it in question. It is also here: lcsc.com/datasheet/C2838108.pdf \$\endgroup\$ Commented yesterday
  • \$\begingroup\$ @SimonB Yes it does; the datasheet says 0.2 N·m max. At least that's how I interpret that somewhat unclear row of the table. \$\endgroup\$ Commented 5 hours ago
  • \$\begingroup\$ @Hearth So it does. I missed that. \$\endgroup\$ Commented 1 hour ago

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.