0
\$\begingroup\$

The aim is to construct an FM modulator circuit with a 10kHz carrier signal and a 1kHz audio signal. I experimented with different component values to enhance the circuit's performance.

V2 represents the 10kHz AC carrier voltage source. V1 is the 1kHz AC audio voltage source.

R1 is used for adjusting the input current level.

C1 and L1 form a resonant LC tank circuit together.

D1, a varactor diode, is essential for achieving frequency modulation.

I observed that when D1 is removed, the circuit behaves like an AM modulator with elevated voltage levels.

My inquiry is: Is it possible for this circuit to actually produce FM modulation? I am looking to simplify this circuit as much as possible for simulation in LTSpice.

I am looking forward to receiving a straightforward and easily understandable response.

circuit without varactor

\$\endgroup\$

2 Answers 2

6
\$\begingroup\$

Analog FM needs either an oscillator which has frequency control voltage input or a voltage controlled phase shift circuit. The later is based on the fact that FM can be seen as phase modulation, only the input signal should be integrated.

Trickier possibilities exist. For example calculating the modulation result in DSP and feeding it to a DA-converter.

Having a varactor in a LC resonant circuit could in some lucky case make a voltage controlled phase shifter. I cannot prove mathematically if it's possible or not. I am afraid (cannot prove it) that no measurable FM happens in your attempted circuits.

I have seen varactors in tank circuits of radio frequency oscillators to make FM possible in a predictable way. The simplest versions do not use varactor. They use the non-ideal voltage dependent junction capacitances of the oscillator transistor, but in such circuits the modulation depth (also known as FM deviation) is difficult to predict beforehand.They are limited to be hobby toys.

10 kHz is so low frequency that I suggest you to try the voltage controlled oscillator (=VCO) route. Numerous different constructions exist. I cannot guess which parts you can and want to use. But there exists accurate operational amplifier circuits, one can use the VCO of a phase locked loop IC and also ancient 555 timer can be used as VCO.

Most of the said circuits have one drawback: The output is not pure sine. If you need sinusoidal output you can kill the harmonics by filtering or make a voltage controlled Wien Bridge oscillator, which has sinusoidal output (assuming the gain control works as needed).

\$\endgroup\$
2
\$\begingroup\$

My inquiry is: Is it possible for this circuit to actually produce FM modulation?

Not one little bit. It would need wholesale changes.

V1 connects indirectly to V2 via a 2k2 resistor and this has zero effect on anything because V2 will remain exactly as it is and, inevitably, V1 becomes just a wasted and pointless signal that does nothing and achieves nothing.

V1 is the 1kHz AC audio voltage source.

No, not at all; you might just as well remove V1 and you will get the same result (with or without the varactor). Incidentally, the presence of the varactor (basically a diode) is just to rectify the output signal with some considerable losses.

I observed that when D1 is removed, the circuit behaves like an AM modulator with elevated voltage levels.

No, that's not what is happening at all; you are driving a perfect tuned circuit with a frequency that isn't quite at resonance and, this is what you will get.

D1, a varactor diode, is essential for achieving frequency modulation.

No, D1 will not bring anything to the party at all; it half wave rectifies the output waveform and limits the resonance of L1 and C1. You can see this when the diode is removed i.e. look at the much bigger and AC symmetrical AC voltage resonance (about 170 volts p-p). With D1 present you just get half wave rectification of the signal and killing of the resonance. Even if you used back-to-back varactors to avoid the rectification issue you still won't get modulation because your modulation signal (V1) does nothing.

I am looking forward to receiving a straightforward and easily understandable response.

Your circuit is fundamentally flawed (that should be easy to understand).

\$\endgroup\$

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.