I don't like the behavior of compilation-goto-locus (bound to Enter in a *compilation* or *grep* buffer), where it splits the window and jumps to the line in a new window. I prefer the *compilation*/*grep* buffer to be entirely replaced. I've accomplished this by copy-pasting the whole definition of compilation-goto-locus into my init.el from compile.el, and commenting out the behavior I don't like. It looks like this
(require 'compile) (defun compilation-goto-locus (msg mk end-mk) "Jump to an error corresponding to MSG at MK. All arguments are markers. If END-MK is non-nil, mark is set there and overlay is highlighted between MK and END-MK." ;; Show compilation buffer in other window, scrolled to this error. (let* ((from-compilation-buffer (eq (window-buffer) (marker-buffer msg))) ;; Use an existing window if it is in a visible frame. (pre-existing (get-buffer-window (marker-buffer msg) 0)) (w (if (and from-compilation-buffer pre-existing) ;; Calling display-buffer here may end up (partly) hiding ;; the error location if the two buffers are in two ;; different frames. So don't do it if it's not necessary. pre-existing (display-buffer (marker-buffer msg) '(nil (allow-no-window . t))))) (highlight-regexp (with-current-buffer (marker-buffer msg) ;; also do this while we change buffer (goto-char (marker-position msg)) (and w (compilation-set-window w msg)) compilation-highlight-regexp))) ;; Ideally, the window-size should be passed to `display-buffer' ;; so it's only used when creating a new window. (when (and (not pre-existing) w) (compilation-set-window-height w)) ;; I commented out this code ;; (if from-compilation-buffer ;; ;; If the compilation buffer window was selected, ;; ;; keep the compilation buffer in this window; ;; ;; display the source in another window. ;; (let ((pop-up-windows t)) ;; (pop-to-buffer (marker-buffer mk) 'other-window)) ;; (switch-to-buffer (marker-buffer mk))) ;; and replaced it with this line (switch-to-buffer (marker-buffer mk)) (unless (eq (goto-char mk) (point)) ;; If narrowing gets in the way of going to the right place, widen. (widen) (if next-error-move-function (funcall next-error-move-function msg mk) (goto-char mk))) (if end-mk (push-mark end-mk t) (if mark-active (setq mark-active))) ;; If hideshow got in the way of ;; seeing the right place, open permanently. (dolist (ov (overlays-at (point))) (when (eq 'hs (overlay-get ov 'invisible)) (delete-overlay ov) (goto-char mk))) (when highlight-regexp (if (timerp next-error-highlight-timer) (cancel-timer next-error-highlight-timer)) (unless compilation-highlight-overlay (setq compilation-highlight-overlay (make-overlay (point-min) (point-min))) (overlay-put compilation-highlight-overlay 'face 'next-error)) (with-current-buffer (marker-buffer mk) (save-excursion (if end-mk (goto-char end-mk) (end-of-line)) (let ((end (point))) (if mk (goto-char mk) (beginning-of-line)) (if (and (stringp highlight-regexp) (re-search-forward highlight-regexp end t)) (progn (goto-char (match-beginning 0)) (move-overlay compilation-highlight-overlay (match-beginning 0) (match-end 0) (current-buffer))) (move-overlay compilation-highlight-overlay (point) end (current-buffer))) (if (or (eq next-error-highlight t) (numberp next-error-highlight)) ;; We want highlighting: delete overlay on next input. (add-hook 'pre-command-hook 'compilation-goto-locus-delete-o) ;; We don't want highlighting: delete overlay now. (delete-overlay compilation-highlight-overlay)) ;; We want highlighting for a limited time: ;; set up a timer to delete it. (when (numberp next-error-highlight) (setq next-error-highlight-timer (run-at-time next-error-highlight nil 'compilation-goto-locus-delete-o))))))) (when (and (eq next-error-highlight 'fringe-arrow)) ;; We want a fringe arrow (instead of highlighting). (setq next-error-overlay-arrow-position (copy-marker (line-beginning-position)))))) my question is: is there a better way to accomplish this? It seems tricky, because the behavior is controlled by the pop-up-windows variable, which the commented out code is explicitly resetting.
display-buffer-overriding-action?