Timeline for AI spam bot user
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 4 at 7:10 | comment | added | Ismael Mod | @GeneralGrievance They review the user, but they couldn't verify if it was a bot. They suggested to continue flagging answers and deleting them as low effort. | |
| Sep 2 at 19:28 | comment | added | General Grievance | @Ismael Did they do anything about it? It looks like they're still posting a lot. | |
| Aug 22 at 11:03 | comment | added | Dan Getz | They're (it's?) still going. | |
| Jul 21 at 23:21 | comment | added | Ismael Mod | Probably it was me that didn't accept 'spam', the account doesn't seem to be promoting a site nor a service. After observing it for a week it seems to be a bot. It didn't answer any of my comments. I reporte the user to Stack Overflow Community Team. | |
| Jul 14 at 16:09 | comment | added | General Grievance | No, this is not "spam" under the flag definition (promotional content). The correct flag category is the "looked at by a moderator" one. Explain why you think it's AIGC in the text box. Yes, copying AIGC without citation is considered inauthentic usage under the policy: ethereum.stackexchange.com/help/gen-ai-policy | |
| Jul 12 at 12:36 | comment | added | Henry WH Hack v3.1.0a | According to the flag pop up, "Spam promotes a product, service, or website while failing to disclose the author's affiliation." Do the posts fall under that category? Unless those answers fall under that category you should not flag them as spam. | |
| Jul 12 at 12:09 | history | asked | Mikko Ohtamaa | CC BY-SA 4.0 |