4
\$\begingroup\$

We've recently decided to get rid of the engine tag, along with api, framework, libraries and sdk.

I haven't noticed before but we also have a tag for , where the description is appropriate, but that has no tag usage.

Like the other tags, I feel this tag does not bring value to the site and is more a meta-tag than anything else.

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
6
\$\begingroup\$

I agree; we should blacklist this tag like we are doing with the others you cited in the original question.

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ There were ten questions with this tag. 8 of them were closed, or ended up closed after I looked at them. The only two remaining didn't even really need the tag, so I removed it. The tag is now blacklisted. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 23, 2017 at 23:21
  • \$\begingroup\$ You should include that in your answer. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 26, 2017 at 20:17
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @Tommy I never include these kinds of comments about the actions taken in response to a meta post in the post itself, even if it's my own post, because I want to keep a distinction between what was proposed and what was implemented, primarily for clarity in what was voted on and when. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Jun 26, 2017 at 20:26

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.