Skip to content

Conversation

@Abhay-raj-srivastava
Copy link

🎯 Summary

This PR cleans up textio.py to improve readability, maintainability, and consistency with the rest of the Beam codebase.

✨ Changes Included

  • Removed duplicated sections of ReadBuffer and related logic.
  • Cleaned up formatting, indentation, and spacing.
  • Organized imports and removed unused ones.
  • Applied consistent type hints.
  • Reduced unnecessary code paths and comments.
  • Improved overall code structure without altering any functionality.

πŸ›  Functional Behavior

This PR introduces no functional changes.
All behavior remains identical β€” only cleanup and formatting were performed.

πŸ“Œ Motivation

While exploring Beam's IO code, I noticed redundant sections and inconsistent formatting in textio.py.
This cleanup makes future contributions easier and reduces the complexity of the file.

βœ” Tests

No logic was changed, so existing tests should continue to pass.


Please review and let me know if any adjustments are needed!

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link
Contributor

Summary of Changes

Hello @Abhay-raj-srivastava, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request delivers a significant cleanup of the textio.py module, focusing on improving its overall readability, maintainability, and consistency with the Apache Beam codebase. The changes involve applying modern Python features like comprehensive type hints and f-strings, organizing imports, and refining code formatting. The primary goal is to simplify future development and reduce complexity without introducing any alterations to the module's functional behavior.

Highlights

  • Improved Type Hinting: Extensive type hints have been added across various classes and methods within textio.py, including _TextSource, _TextSourceWithFilename, and _TextSink, enhancing code clarity and maintainability.
  • Enhanced Code Formatting: The pull request introduces consistent formatting, indentation, and spacing improvements throughout the textio.py file, making the code more readable and aligned with Beam's style guidelines. This includes updating string formatting to use f-strings where appropriate.
  • Streamlined Imports and Docstrings: Import statements have been organized, and unused imports removed. Additionally, docstrings for Pandas-related I/O transforms (ReadFromCsv, WriteToCsv, ReadFromJson, WriteToJson) have been refactored for conciseness, directing users to the underlying Pandas documentation for detailed parameter explanations.
  • No Functional Changes: All changes are purely for cleanup and refactoring; no functional behavior of the textio.py module has been altered, ensuring existing pipelines will continue to operate identically.
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with πŸ‘ and πŸ‘Ž on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩

@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Dec 1, 2025

Checks are failing. Will not request review until checks are succeeding. If you'd like to override that behavior, comment assign set of reviewers

@Abhay-raj-srivastava
Copy link
Author

Abhay-raj-srivastava commented Dec 2, 2025

Hi maintainers!
This PR is ready for CI. Could you please approve running the precommit workflows?
This PR only contains cleanup and formatting changes in textio.py, with no functional modifications.
Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

1 participant