- Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 4.4k
[OpenTelemetry] Model changes to allow OpenTelemtry context propagation #36962
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
| R: @sjvanrossum |
Summary of ChangesHello @stankiewicz, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed! This pull request lays the foundational groundwork for integrating OpenTelemetry context propagation within Apache Beam. It involves updating OpenTelemetry dependencies, extending the internal data model ( Highlights
Using Gemini Code AssistThe full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips. Invoking Gemini You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either
Customization To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a Limitations & Feedback Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here. You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension. Footnotes
|
| Stopping reviewer notifications for this pull request: review requested by someone other than the bot, ceding control. If you'd like to restart, comment |
| /gemini review |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
The pull request effectively integrates OpenTelemetry context propagation into Apache Beam's core data structures and serialization mechanisms. This foundational change is well-implemented across various files, ensuring the Context is carried alongside WindowedValue elements. Key aspects include updating dependencies, extending the protocol buffer schema for traceparent and tracestate, modifying core WindowedValue interfaces and implementations to include the Context, and implementing robust serialization/deserialization logic via OpenTelemetryContextSerializer. The addition of a test case in WindowedValueTest.java validates the new functionality. The use of null for getContext() in specific overrides is consistent with the stated scope that the context is not yet consumed by users. Overall, this is a solid and necessary step towards comprehensive OpenTelemetry integration.
| // todo radek decode w3c context | ||
| // context = elementMetadata |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gemini-code-assist good bot!
| // W3C Propagator knows what keys it wants, but this satisfies the interface | ||
| return Collections.emptyList(); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The comment // W3C Propagator knows what keys it wants, but this satisfies the interface for the keys method in TextMapGetter is a bit vague. While Collections.emptyList() might satisfy the interface, it would be more robust to return the actual keys that the W3C propagator expects, if known, or provide a more explicit explanation of why emptyList is sufficient and correct here.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@gemini-code-assist good bot!
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you for the feedback!
Changes:
Next PRs:
Thank you for your contribution! Follow this checklist to help us incorporate your contribution quickly and easily:
addresses #123), if applicable. This will automatically add a link to the pull request in the issue. If you would like the issue to automatically close on merging the pull request, commentfixes #<ISSUE NUMBER>instead.CHANGES.mdwith noteworthy changes.See the Contributor Guide for more tips on how to make review process smoother.
To check the build health, please visit https://github.com/apache/beam/blob/master/.test-infra/BUILD_STATUS.md
GitHub Actions Tests Status (on master branch)
See CI.md for more information about GitHub Actions CI or the workflows README to see a list of phrases to trigger workflows.