Skip to content

Conversation

@renovate
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Dec 2, 2025

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Type Update Change
bazel_lib http_archive patch v3.0.0-beta.1 -> v3.0.1

Release Notes

bazel-contrib/bazel-lib (bazel_lib)

v3.0.1

Compare Source

Using Bzlmod

Add to your MODULE.bazel file:

bazel_dep(name = "bazel_lib", version = "3.0.1")

Using WORKSPACE (deprecated)

Paste this snippet into your WORKSPACE file:

load("@​bazel_tools//tools/build_defs/repo:http.bzl", "http_archive") http_archive( name = "bazel_lib", sha256 = "8b074b1a2731d29f6b95defdca95297354dc424492caf7019cf6b9f36afba54f", strip_prefix = "bazel-lib-3.0.1", url = "https://github.com/bazel-contrib/bazel-lib/releases/download/v3.0.1/bazel-lib-v3.0.1.tar.gz", ) load("@​bazel_lib//lib:repositories.bzl", "bazel_lib_dependencies", "bazel_lib_register_toolchains") # Required bazel-lib dependencies bazel_lib_dependencies() # Required rules_shell dependencies load("@​rules_shell//shell:repositories.bzl", "rules_shell_dependencies", "rules_shell_toolchains") rules_shell_dependencies() rules_shell_toolchains() # Register bazel-lib toolchains bazel_lib_register_toolchains() # Create the host platform repository transitively required by bazel-lib load("@​bazel_tools//tools/build_defs/repo:utils.bzl", "maybe") load("@​platforms//host:extension.bzl", "host_platform_repo") maybe( host_platform_repo, name = "host_platform", )

What's Changed

Full Changelog: bazel-contrib/bazel-lib@v3.0.0...v3.0.1


Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, check this box

This PR was generated by Mend Renovate. View the repository job log.

@aspect-workflows
Copy link

aspect-workflows bot commented Dec 2, 2025

Test

All tests were cache hits

1 test (100.0%) was fully cached saving 50ms.

Copy link

@chatgpt-codex-connector chatgpt-codex-connector bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💡 Codex Review

Here are some automated review suggestions for this pull request.

ℹ️ About Codex in GitHub

Codex has been enabled to automatically review pull requests in this repo. Reviews are triggered when you

  • Open a pull request for review
  • Mark a draft as ready
  • Comment "@codex review".

If Codex has suggestions, it will comment; otherwise it will react with 👍.

When you sign up for Codex through ChatGPT, Codex can also answer questions or update the PR, like "@codex address that feedback".

Comment on lines 40 to +44
http_archive(
name = "bazel_lib",
sha256 = "46960e9fa6c9352d883768280951ac388dba8cb9ff0256182fb77925eae2b6ac",
strip_prefix = "bazel-lib-3.0.0-beta.1",
url = "https://github.com/bazel-contrib/bazel-lib/releases/download/v3.0.0-beta.1/bazel-lib-v3.0.0-beta.1.tar.gz",
sha256 = "8b074b1a2731d29f6b95defdca95297354dc424492caf7019cf6b9f36afba54f",
strip_prefix = "bazel-lib-3.0.1",
url = "https://github.com/bazel-contrib/bazel-lib/releases/download/v3.0.1/bazel-lib-v3.0.1.tar.gz",

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

P1 Badge Align bazel_lib version for bzlmod builds

rules_nodejs_dev_dependencies now fetches bazel_lib 3.0.1, but MODULE.bazel still pins bazel_dep(... version = "3.0.0-beta.1"). Bzlmod consumers will therefore keep pulling 3.0.0-beta.1 and miss the 3.0.1 fixes (including the Bazel 9 build fix called out in the release notes), while WORKSPACE users get 3.0.1. This newly introduced divergence means Bazel 9 builds using Bzlmod continue to fail even though the dependency was supposedly upgraded here; bump the module dependency to the same version.

Useful? React with 👍 / 👎.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant