Update cloudbuild.yaml for Google Developer Course #11
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Cloud build fails with exception "Your build failed to run: generic::invalid_argument: if 'build.service_account' is specified, the build must either (a) specify 'build.logs_bucket', (b) use the REGIONAL_USER_OWNED_BUCKET build.options.default_logs_bucket_behavior option, or (c) use either CLOUD_LOGGING_ONLY / NONE logging options" To resolve, I added this to cloudbuild.yaml ``` options: logging: CLOUD_LOGGING_ONLY ```
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Cloud build fails with exception
To resolve it, I added this to cloudbuild.yaml
FYI, the tutorial for google-cloud-certified-professional-cloud-developer in Udemy has us create a Cloud Source Repository (181. Step 06 - Cloud Build Demo - Getting Code Ready with Cloud Source Repository), which is now deprecated. I tested the code with a GitHub hook.