Graceful JavaScript templates.
Do you feel comfortable? Like this
@if(user){ <h2>@user.name</h2> } is it more graceful than ejs?
I just don't like ejs, that's why I designed rjs
I think you'll like it.
browser
<script src="dist/rjs.js"></script> nodeJS
$ npm install rarzor-js-template browser
var html = rjs.compile(`<ul> @for(var i=0;i<users.length;i++>) { <li><span>@users[i].name</span></li> } </ul>`,{ users:[{name:"Donald John Trump"},{name:"Obama"},{name:"George Walker Bush"}] }); nodejs
var RJS=require('rarzor-js-template'); var rjs=new RJS({ include(filePath,data)=>{ var template=require("fs").readFileSync(path.join(__dirname,filePath+".rjs"),"utf8"); return RJS.compile(template,data); } }); var html=rjs.compile(`<ul> @for(var i=0;i<users.length;i++>) { @{var user=users[i];} @include("user/show",user) } </ul>`, {users:[ {name:"Donald John Trump",email:"trump@viewparse.com"}, {name:"Obama",email:"obama@viewparse.com"} ] }); You can define @include() statement
define @html() for HTML escape
You can do more
It's very easy
It doesn't just support HTML, it supports product code
rjs.compile(` if(confrim("@message")){ alert("@yes"); } else{ alert("@no"); } `,{ message:"Do you confirm to cancel this submission?", yes:"Cancel the submission", no:"Submit" }) You need to make sure that () and {} are paired, otherwise you'll get an error
- @for(){}
- @while(){}
- @if(){ }else if(){ } else{ }
- @{} statement
- @() express
- escape character ["@@","@)","@}","@#{","@#("]
() and {} are normally paired, and the escape character is mainly used to match half
- @**@ annotation
MIT License