Add interfaces of superclasses in ancestors set #1528
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Damtev approved these changes Dec 15, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
There has been a problem in that we didn't add interfaces for superclasses in the ancestors set, only interfaces for the class itself. This request fixes this behaviour.
Fixes #1527
Type of Change
How Has This Been Tested?
Regression and integration tests
org.utbot.examples.mixed.SerializableExampleTest#testExampleAutomated Testing
org.utbot.examples.mixed.SerializableExampleTest#testExampleManual Scenario
There are no manual scenarios.
Checklist: