Standardize response schemas for variables and xcoms in Execution API#63995
Open
rjgoyln wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Open
Standardize response schemas for variables and xcoms in Execution API#63995rjgoyln wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
rjgoyln wants to merge 2 commits intoapache:mainfrom
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Currently, the Execution API has inconsistent response formats for success messages. While endpoints like
connections.pyreturn well-defined Pydantic schemas (e.g.,ConnectionResponse), others likevariables.pyandxcoms.pyreturn raw Python dictionaries (e.g.,{"message": "..."}).Returning raw dictionaries causes the OpenAPI specification to default to
Anyorobject, which makes it difficult to generate strongly-typed SDKs and Clients.Was generative AI tooling used to co-author this PR?
{pr_number}.significant.rst, in airflow-core/newsfragments. You can add this file in a follow-up commit after the PR is created so you know the PR number.