Skip to content

cwl-inputs-schema-gen testing utility#376

Draft
mr-c wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
inputs_jsonschema_deep_testing
Draft

cwl-inputs-schema-gen testing utility#376
mr-c wants to merge 3 commits intomainfrom
inputs_jsonschema_deep_testing

Conversation

@mr-c
Copy link
Member

@mr-c mr-c commented Sep 30, 2025

@mr-c mr-c marked this pull request as draft September 30, 2025 10:02
@mr-c mr-c force-pushed the inputs_jsonschema_deep_testing branch 3 times, most recently from e648962 to dda7c3a Compare September 30, 2025 12:01
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 34.66%. Comparing base (b9de378) to head (a62cb46).

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #376 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 34.66% 34.66% ======================================= Files 30 30 Lines 35412 35412 Branches 9538 9538 ======================================= Hits 12275 12275 Misses 20257 20257 Partials 2880 2880 

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.
@mr-c
Copy link
Member Author

mr-c commented Sep 30, 2025

Many thanks to @suecharo and @alexiswl for cwl-inputs-schema-gen!

@mvdbeek is using cwl-inputs-schema-gen for CWL in Galaxy, so I took Marius's suggestion to stress test it by running all the conformance tests and their inputs. I was not able to find any areas of improvement yet!

@mr-c mr-c force-pushed the inputs_jsonschema_deep_testing branch 2 times, most recently from 2bf18be to 5e8d628 Compare October 2, 2025 05:54
@mr-c mr-c force-pushed the inputs_jsonschema_deep_testing branch from 5e8d628 to a62cb46 Compare December 14, 2025 10:06
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant