Description
Today it shows up that the waterways marked as intermittent=yes are darker in tone (dashed blue) in comparison to the normal stream/rivers (solid blue).
This "new" tone seems to be confusing, because has been the standard for tunnels and culverts (Underground) and not to the intermittent flows (Dashed blue)
Screenshots
Version
2.5.5
What browser are you seeing the problem on? What version are you running?
No response
The OS you're using
No response
Steps to reproduce
- draw a river or stream, you will see a solid blue line
- activate the Intermitent=yes, you will see a dashed blue line, darker in tone that the solid blue line original
- if you a add a tunnel or culvert, you will see the same darker tone
- same blue color dashed or not should be used for surface waters
The browser URL at the time you encountered the bug
https://rapideditor.org/edit#map=17.49/-19.06139/-64.59403&background=Bing&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings,omdFootways,overture-places&disable_features=boundaries&poweruser=true
The auto-detected useragent string for your browser (leave blank if you're manually filling this form out)
No response
Description
Today it shows up that the waterways marked as intermittent=yes are darker in tone (dashed blue) in comparison to the normal stream/rivers (solid blue).
This "new" tone seems to be confusing, because has been the standard for tunnels and culverts (Underground) and not to the intermittent flows (Dashed blue)
Screenshots
Version
2.5.5
What browser are you seeing the problem on? What version are you running?
No response
The OS you're using
No response
Steps to reproduce
The browser URL at the time you encountered the bug
https://rapideditor.org/edit#map=17.49/-19.06139/-64.59403&background=Bing&datasets=fbRoads,msBuildings,omdFootways,overture-places&disable_features=boundaries&poweruser=true
The auto-detected useragent string for your browser (leave blank if you're manually filling this form out)
No response