Description

Lint rules complain about this:

outer: for (const row of rows) { for (const elt of row) { if (elt === 0) break outer; // compute on elt } }

which is the most succinct way to stop processing the current row and all following rows, once a zero is encountered anywhere.

They complain in two ways, first no-restricted-syntax complains about any label of any kind. Then no-labels complains twice, first about the label again, and second about the break statement with a label.

Expected behavior

No complaints. I'd probably be ok with a complaint about this:

label: { var a = f(); if (something()) break label; //etc }

as that's weird (but apparently legal). However labels are needed on looping constructs for exactly the purpose outlined here.

Actual behavior

Three lint complaints.