Skip to content

chore: regenerate README #579

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

chore: regenerate README #579

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

@yoshi-automation
Copy link
Contributor

@yoshi-automation yoshi-automation commented Dec 17, 2020

This PR was generated using Autosynth. 🌈

Log from Synthtool 
2020-12-17 00:52:15,140 synthtool [DEBUG] > Executing /root/.cache/synthtool/java-bigtable/.github/readme/synth.py. On branch autosynth-readme nothing to commit, working tree clean 2020-12-17 00:52:16,111 synthtool [DEBUG] > Wrote metadata to .github/readme/synth.metadata/synth.metadata.

Full log will be available here:
https://source.cloud.google.com/results/invocations/3273e26a-61f4-48f8-9ce3-7eabbbf9421b/targets

  • To automatically regenerate this PR, check this box.
@yoshi-automation yoshi-automation requested review from a team as code owners December 17, 2020 00:52
@product-auto-label product-auto-label bot added the api: bigtable Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigtable API. label Dec 17, 2020
@google-cla google-cla bot added the cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement. label Dec 17, 2020
yoshi-approver
yoshi-approver approved these changes Dec 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Collaborator

@yoshi-approver yoshi-approver left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Rubber stamped PR!
@yoshi-approver yoshi-approver added the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 17, 2020
igorbernstein2
igorbernstein2 requested changes Dec 17, 2020
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@igorbernstein2 igorbernstein2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Unfortunately this went stale and needs to be rebased
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 17, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Codecov Report

Merging #579 (b73f575) into master (8240779) will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #579 +/- ## ============================================ - Coverage 81.67% 81.66% -0.02%  Complexity 1151 1151 ============================================ Files 109 109 Lines 7192 7192 Branches 376 376 ============================================ - Hits 5874 5873 -1  - Misses 1118 1120 +2  + Partials 200 199 -1
Impacted Files Coverage Δ Complexity Δ
...om/google/cloud/bigtable/emulator/v2/Emulator.java 59.83% <0.00%> (-0.82%) 14.00% <0.00%> (ø%)

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 8240779...b73f575. Read the comment docs.
@gcf-merge-on-green
Copy link

gcf-merge-on-green bot commented Dec 17, 2020

Merge-on-green attempted to merge your PR for 6 hours, but it was not mergeable because either one of your required status checks failed, one of your required reviews was not approved, or there is a do not merge label. Learn more about your required status checks here: https://help.github.com/en/github/administering-a-repository/enabling-required-status-checks. You can remove and reapply the label to re-run the bot.
@gcf-merge-on-green gcf-merge-on-green bot removed the automerge Merge the pull request once unit tests and other checks pass. label Dec 17, 2020
@kolea2
Copy link
Contributor

kolea2 commented Dec 17, 2020 •
edited
Loading

Unfortunately this went stale and needs to be rebased

@mutianf my latest change to switch to autogenerating the readme (#568) now requires any custom readme content to be added to https://github.com/googleapis/java-bigtable/blob/master/.readme-partials.yml. Can you add your README changes from #557 there instead? This will get things back in sync
@mutianf mutianf closed this Dec 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

api: bigtable Issues related to the googleapis/java-bigtable API. cla: yes This human has signed the Contributor License Agreement.

5 participants

@yoshi-automation @kolea2 @igorbernstein2 @yoshi-approver @mutianf