Microsoft Copilot vs Github Copilot #103027
-
| If I already pay for Copilot Pro through Microsoft, do I have to pay separately through Github too? That feels weird since it's branded as one product. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 10 comments 3 replies
-
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| I already pay for both and called into Microsoft Support. They were confused by my question, and kept interpreting it as an issue with double billing. They also mentioned they don't have any visibility into Github billing. I think that suggests MS treats the two Copilot products separately. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as spam.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
This comment was marked as off-topic.
-
| Just for kicks, I asked Copilot itself, and this was the last part of the response :-) In summary, if you pay for Microsoft Copilot, it does not automatically cover the cost of GitHub Copilot. They are separate services with distinct pricing models. Choose the one that best aligns with your needs and development environment! 🚀 Source: Conversation with Bing, 3/19/2024 |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Well, there SHOULD either be bundled or given a discount for having both services. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| I just ran into this. I have copilot 365 as well and I'm using it to write code, but when I try to use observable my free tier is crap... essentially nonfunctional. Thing is, I want to use it for observable and I'm using observable both online and offline. The online version MUST use github copilot while the offline MUST use microsoft copilot... and the sessions exist in their respective session stores/associations. It's not just the price, it's also the confusion and mess that comes from having online and offline versions of copilot that don't play together and quite possibly use completely different models. If I were any kind of corporate entity I'd be tempted to throw together ollama on AWS or Azure with an uncensored llama 2 or other 2048++ token model (mistral maybe). The idea being: predictable version control and tool chain not subject to unreliable session storage and security. In code/vim/neovim I'm not going to have an issue because I can pick my private LLM in those, but not github so... even bigger mess now. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Microsoft, fix this shit. One should give you access to the other and vice versa. WTF |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
-
| Why is Microsoft have'nt even thought this through? This so confusing, terribly worse when we have to pay and find out which we cannot use? And specifically in vscode, lot many jorgans with copilot and azure/ms copilot mixing that i no/know more understand to draw a lion/line on this?! Thanks for your deep expertise MS! |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
I already pay for both and called into Microsoft Support. They were confused by my question, and kept interpreting it as an issue with double billing. They also mentioned they don't have any visibility into Github billing. I think that suggests MS treats the two Copilot products separately.