Skip to content

Conversation

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Apr 24, 2017

closes #16107

this might slow things down (because of the inferring), so will have to make a fix for that.

@jreback jreback added the Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version label Apr 24, 2017
@jreback jreback added this to the 0.20.0 milestone Apr 24, 2017
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Apr 24, 2017

ok this doesn't regress performance (and helps in a couple of situations).

@jreback jreback force-pushed the unique_nan branch 3 times, most recently from 3962e10 to 93cf83a Compare April 24, 2017 22:49
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 25, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #16108 into master will increase coverage by <.01%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #16108 +/- ## ========================================== + Coverage 90.83% 90.83% +<.01%  ========================================== Files 159 159 Lines 50768 50771 +3 ========================================== + Hits 46117 46120 +3  Misses 4651 4651
Flag Coverage Δ
#multiple 88.61% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
#single 40.33% <0%> (-0.01%) ⬇️
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
pandas/core/algorithms.py 94.44% <100%> (+0.02%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update f8b25c2...17cc098. Read the comment docs.

@jreback jreback merged commit 72248e7 into pandas-dev:master Apr 25, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Regression Functionality that used to work in a prior pandas version

1 participant