Skip to content

ENH: extend selection semantics on ordered timeseries to unordered #3133

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Closed
wants to merge 3 commits into from
Closed

ENH: extend selection semantics on ordered timeseries to unordered #3133

wants to merge 3 commits into from

Conversation

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

@jreback jreback commented Mar 22, 2013

closes #2437
closes #2787
closes #3070
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 22, 2013

related #3070
Selection semantics should be a property of the underlying index type, not the data
container type wrapping it.
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Mar 22, 2013

thanks....pretty straightforward to wrap up #3070 in this

going for a 3-fer
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 22, 2013

do it in seperate branches and use an octopus merge ftw.
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Mar 22, 2013

what's an octopus merge?
@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 22, 2013

this
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor Author

jreback commented Mar 22, 2013

moved to other PR's
@jreback jreback closed this Mar 22, 2013
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Bug Datetime Datetime data dtype Enhancement Indexing Related to indexing on series/frames, not to indexes themselves

1 participant

@jreback