BUG: TimeGrouper sortedness / API fix (GH4161,GH3881) #6350
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…DatetimeIndex would return invalid results. (GH4161) BUG: Bug in index name propogation in TimeGrouper/resample (GH4161) API: TimeGrouper has a more compatible API to the rest of the groupers (e.g. ``groups`` was missing) (GH3881)
jreback added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 14, 2014
BUG: TimeGrouper sortedness / API fix (GH4161,GH3881)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
BUG: Bug in TimeGrouper/resample when presented with a non-monotonic DatetimeIndex would return invalid results,
BUG: Bug in index name propogation in TimeGrouper/resample
closes #4161
API: TimeGrouper has a more compatible API to the rest of the groupers (e.g.
groupswas missing)closes #3881