Skip to content

WIP: Test using lcov#542

Draft
jeltz wants to merge 1 commit intopercona:mainfrom
jeltz:lcov
Draft

WIP: Test using lcov#542
jeltz wants to merge 1 commit intopercona:mainfrom
jeltz:lcov

Conversation

@jeltz
Copy link
Collaborator

@jeltz jeltz commented Mar 19, 2026

Test to see if using lcov to preprocess the gcov files helps anything.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Mar 19, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.37%. Comparing base (0d5f61d) to head (4f6777f).

❌ Your project status has failed because the head coverage (74.07%) is below the target coverage (90.00%). You can increase the head coverage or adjust the target coverage.

Additional details and impacted files
@@ Coverage Diff @@ ## main #542 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 58.63% 56.37% -2.27%  ========================================== Files 68 67 -1 Lines 10696 10761 +65 Branches 1842 2779 +937 ========================================== - Hits 6272 6066 -206  + Misses 3557 3284 -273  - Partials 867 1411 +544 
Components Coverage Δ
access 76.02% <ø> (-4.75%) ⬇️
bin 64.97% <ø> (-4.86%) ⬇️
catalog 76.31% <ø> (-8.33%) ⬇️
common 72.22% <ø> (ø)
encryption 48.59% <ø> (-10.24%) ⬇️
keyring 63.87% <ø> (-3.94%) ⬇️
src 86.61% <ø> (-3.44%) ⬇️
smgr 89.23% <ø> (-2.09%) ⬇️
🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
@jeltz jeltz changed the title WIP: Test uisng lcov WIP: Test using lcov Mar 19, 2026
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

2 participants