Skip to content
Open
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
203 changes: 203 additions & 0 deletions Price Comparison and Checker/test_PriceComparisonAmazon.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,203 @@
# ********RoostGPT********
"""
Test generated by RoostGPT for test cloude-amazing-python using AI Type Claude AI and AI Model claude-3-opus-20240229

ROOST_METHOD_HASH=price_comparison_amazon_c17cf6f82c
ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=price_comparison_amazon_df619bfae2

================================VULNERABILITIES================================
Vulnerability: CWE-20: Improper Input Validation
Issue: The 'item' parameter in the 'amazon' function is not properly validated or sanitized before being used in the URL construction. This could allow attackers to inject malicious input, potentially leading to URL redirection or cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks.
Solution: Implement proper input validation and sanitization techniques. Use a well-tested URL encoding library to safely encode the 'item' parameter before including it in the URL. Alternatively, consider using a whitelist approach to validate the input against a predefined set of allowed characters.

Vulnerability: CWE-829: Inclusion of Functionality from Untrusted Control Sphere
Issue: The code directly uses the 'requests' library to make HTTP requests without any additional security measures. This could potentially allow attackers to exploit vulnerabilities in the 'requests' library or perform unauthorized actions if the library is compromised.
Solution: Ensure that you are using a trusted and up-to-date version of the 'requests' library. Regularly update the library to the latest version to include security patches. Consider using a virtual environment to isolate the dependencies for your project and prevent conflicts with other system-wide packages.

Vulnerability: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Issue: The code does not handle exceptions or errors that may occur during the HTTP request or parsing process. If an exception is raised, sensitive information such as stack traces or error messages could be exposed to unauthorized users.
Solution: Implement proper exception handling mechanisms to gracefully handle errors and prevent the exposure of sensitive information. Use generic error messages in user-facing outputs and log detailed error information to a secure log file accessible only to authorized personnel.

================================================================================
Here are the Pytest test scenarios for the provided `amazon` function:

```
Scenario 1: Successful Search and Cheapest Product Retrieval
Details:
TestName: test_successful_search_and_cheapest_product_retrieval
Description: Verify that the function can successfully search for a product on Amazon, extract the product names and prices, and return the cheapest product details.
Execution:
Arrange: Set up the necessary test data, including a valid search item.
Act: Call the `amazon` function with the prepared search item.
Assert: Check that the function returns a tuple containing the cheapest product name, price, and the name "Amazon".
Validation:
This test ensures that the core functionality of the `amazon` function works as expected. It validates that the function can retrieve product information from Amazon, extract the relevant data, and correctly identify the cheapest product.

Scenario 2: Empty Search Results
Details:
TestName: test_empty_search_results
Description: Verify that the function handles empty search results gracefully and returns None.
Execution:
Arrange: Set up a test case with a search item that is unlikely to yield any results on Amazon.
Act: Call the `amazon` function with the prepared search item.
Assert: Check that the function returns None.
Validation:
This test case validates that the function can handle scenarios where the search query does not return any matching products on Amazon. It ensures that the function does not raise any exceptions and returns None to indicate the absence of search results.

Scenario 3: Price Extraction and Conversion
Details:
TestName: test_price_extraction_and_conversion
Description: Verify that the function correctly extracts prices from the HTML and converts them to integers using the `priceToInt` function.
Execution:
Arrange: Set up a test case with a search item that is known to have products with valid prices on Amazon.
Act: Call the `amazon` function with the prepared search item.
Assert: Check that the prices extracted by the function match the expected values after conversion to integers.
Validation:
This test case focuses on the price extraction and conversion logic within the `amazon` function. It ensures that the function accurately extracts the prices from the HTML elements and applies the `priceToInt` function to convert them to integers for further processing.

Scenario 4: Search Query Formatting
Details:
TestName: test_search_query_formatting
Description: Verify that the function correctly formats the search query by replacing spaces with "+" characters in the URL.
Execution:
Arrange: Set up a test case with a search item containing spaces.
Act: Call the `amazon` function with the prepared search item.
Assert: Check that the generated URL in the function contains the correctly formatted search query with "+" characters instead of spaces.
Validation:
This test case validates the search query formatting logic within the `amazon` function. It ensures that the function properly replaces spaces in the search item with "+" characters when constructing the URL for the Amazon search request.

Scenario 5: Error Handling for Network Issues
Details:
TestName: test_error_handling_for_network_issues
Description: Verify that the function handles network-related errors gracefully and returns an appropriate message.
Execution:
Arrange: Set up a test case where the network connection is intentionally disrupted or the Amazon website is unreachable.
Act: Call the `amazon` function with a valid search item.
Assert: Check that the function catches the network-related exception and returns an appropriate error message.
Validation:
This test case ensures that the `amazon` function is resilient to network issues. It validates that the function can handle scenarios where the network connection is unavailable or the Amazon website is not responding, and it provides a meaningful error message to indicate the failure.
```

These test scenarios cover various aspects of the `amazon` function's business logic, including successful searches, empty search results, price extraction and conversion, search query formatting, and error handling for network issues. They provide a comprehensive set of tests to ensure the function behaves as expected under different conditions.
"""

# ********RoostGPT********
import pytest
import requests
from bs4 import BeautifulSoup
from unittest.mock import Mock, patch

def amazon(item):
# TODO: Implement the amazon function
pass

def priceToInt(price):
# Converts the text scraped from website into integer for proper comparison
converted_price = []
for i in price:
if i.isdigit():
converted_price.append(i) # Extracting only digits

# Converting the string price to integer for comparison
converted_price = int("".join(converted_price))
return converted_price

def cheapest(products, prices, name):
# Prints top 5 products and returns the cheapest price
productList = list(zip(products, prices))
productList.sort(key=lambda x: x[1])
print(name.upper() + " TOP 5 PRODUCTS:")
print(tabulate(productList, headers=["Product Name", "Price (Rs.)"]), end="\n\n")
# Returns only the cheapest price for each website for final comparison
return productList[0][1]

def test_successful_search_and_cheapest_product_retrieval():
# Arrange
item = "sample item" # TODO: Provide a valid search item
expected_name = "Amazon"
expected_price = 100 # TODO: Provide the expected cheapest price
expected_product = "Sample Product 1" # TODO: Provide the expected cheapest product name

# Act
with patch("requests.get") as mock_get:
mock_response = Mock()
mock_response.content = """
<html>
<body>
<span class="a-size-base-plus a-color-base a-text-normal">Sample Product 1</span>
<span class="a-size-base-plus a-color-base a-text-normal">Sample Product 2</span>
<span class="a-price-whole">100</span>
<span class="a-price-whole">200</span>
</body>
</html>
"""
mock_get.return_value = mock_response
result = amazon(item)

# Assert
assert result == (expected_price, expected_product)

def test_empty_search_results():
# Arrange
item = "non-existent item" # TODO: Provide a search item that yields no results

# Act
with patch("requests.get") as mock_get:
mock_response = Mock()
mock_response.content = """
<html>
<body>
<!-- No search results -->
</body>
</html>
"""
mock_get.return_value = mock_response
result = amazon(item)

# Assert
assert result is None

def test_price_extraction_and_conversion():
# Arrange
item = "sample item" # TODO: Provide a valid search item
expected_prices = [100, 200] # TODO: Provide the expected prices after conversion

# Act
with patch("requests.get") as mock_get:
mock_response = Mock()
mock_response.content = """
<html>
<body>
<span class="a-price-whole">100</span>
<span class="a-price-whole">200</span>
</body>
</html>
"""
mock_get.return_value = mock_response
amazon(item)

# Assert
assert priceToInt("100") == expected_prices[0]
assert priceToInt("200") == expected_prices[1]

def test_search_query_formatting():
# Arrange
item = "sample item with spaces"
expected_url = "https://www.amazon.in/s?k=sample+item+with+spaces"

# Act
with patch("requests.get") as mock_get:
amazon(item)
actual_url = mock_get.call_args[0][0]

# Assert
assert actual_url == expected_url

def test_error_handling_for_network_issues():
# Arrange
item = "sample item"

# Act and Assert
with patch("requests.get", side_effect=requests.exceptions.RequestException("Network Error")):
with pytest.raises(requests.exceptions.RequestException):
amazon(item)
157 changes: 157 additions & 0 deletions Price Comparison and Checker/test_PriceComparisonCheapest.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,157 @@
# ********RoostGPT********
"""
Test generated by RoostGPT for test cloude-amazing-python using AI Type Claude AI and AI Model claude-3-opus-20240229

ROOST_METHOD_HASH=price_comparison_cheapest_dbed1ffd43
ROOST_METHOD_SIG_HASH=price_comparison_cheapest_eac203e2aa

================================VULNERABILITIES================================
Vulnerability: CWE-1104: Use of Unmaintained Third Party Components
Issue: The code uses the requests library which is a popular but unmaintained third-party package. Using unmaintained dependencies can introduce security vulnerabilities if they contain unpatched issues.
Solution: Switch to using a maintained library for making HTTP requests such as httpx or urllib3. Ensure dependencies are kept up-to-date and regularly check for any reported security issues.

Vulnerability: CWE-916: Use of Password Hash With Insufficient Computational Effort
Issue: The code does not properly validate or sanitize external input from web scraping. Untrusted data from parsed HTML could potentially be used in an unsafe manner leading to vulnerabilities like SQL injection or cross-site scripting if the data is handled improperly.
Solution: Implement strict input validation and sanitization on any external data obtained from web scraping, such as with BeautifulSoup. Escape or sanitize untrusted input before using it, especially if it gets included in SQL queries, HTML output, or passed to other functions. Consider using libraries like bleach for sanitizing HTML.

Vulnerability: CWE-200: Exposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor
Issue: Price and product data scraped from websites may be sensitive information. Storing or exposing this data insecurely could allow unauthorized access.
Solution: Ensure any sensitive data is encrypted at rest and in transit. Implement access controls to limit exposure only to authorized users or systems. Avoid logging or storing more data than is necessary.

================================================================================
Here are the Pytest test scenarios for the provided `cheapest` function:

Scenario 1: Verify cheapest product is returned
Details:
TestName: test_cheapest_product_returned
Description: This test verifies that the `cheapest` function correctly returns the cheapest price from the provided list of products and prices.
Execution:
Arrange: Prepare a list of products and corresponding prices.
Act: Invoke the `cheapest` function with the prepared products, prices, and a name.
Assert: Check that the returned value matches the expected cheapest price.
Validation:
This test is crucial to ensure that the `cheapest` function accurately identifies and returns the lowest price from the given list of products, aligning with the business requirement of finding the most affordable option.

Scenario 2: Verify top 5 products are printed
Details:
TestName: test_top_five_products_printed
Description: This test verifies that the `cheapest` function correctly prints the top 5 products sorted by price.
Execution:
Arrange: Prepare a list of products and corresponding prices.
Act: Invoke the `cheapest` function with the prepared products, prices, and a name.
Assert: Capture the printed output and verify that it contains the expected top 5 products sorted by price.
Validation:
This test ensures that the `cheapest` function provides the user with a helpful overview of the top 5 most affordable products, enhancing the user experience and aligning with the business goal of presenting relevant information.

Scenario 3: Verify behavior with empty product list
Details:
TestName: test_empty_product_list
Description: This test verifies the behavior of the `cheapest` function when provided with an empty list of products.
Execution:
Arrange: Prepare an empty list of products and an empty list of prices.
Act: Invoke the `cheapest` function with the empty lists and a name.
Assert: Check that the function handles the empty input gracefully, either returning a special value or raising an appropriate exception.
Validation:
This test ensures that the `cheapest` function can handle the edge case of an empty product list, preventing unexpected errors and providing a clear indication to the user or caller.

Scenario 4: Verify behavior with duplicate prices
Details:
TestName: test_duplicate_prices
Description: This test verifies that the `cheapest` function correctly handles the scenario where multiple products have the same cheapest price.
Execution:
Arrange: Prepare a list of products and corresponding prices, including multiple products with the same cheapest price.
Act: Invoke the `cheapest` function with the prepared products, prices, and a name.
Assert: Check that the function returns the expected cheapest price and prints the top 5 products, including the duplicates.
Validation:
This test ensures that the `cheapest` function can handle the case of multiple products having the same lowest price, providing accurate results and maintaining the integrity of the top 5 products list.

Scenario 5: Verify behavior with large dataset
Details:
TestName: test_large_dataset
Description: This test verifies the performance and correctness of the `cheapest` function when provided with a large dataset of products and prices.
Execution:
Arrange: Prepare a large list of products and corresponding prices (e.g., 1000+ items).
Act: Invoke the `cheapest` function with the large dataset and a name.
Assert: Check that the function returns the correct cheapest price and prints the top 5 products within a reasonable time frame.
Validation:
This test ensures that the `cheapest` function can efficiently handle large datasets, providing accurate results and maintaining acceptable performance, which is essential for scalability and user satisfaction.

These test scenarios cover various aspects of the `cheapest` function's behavior, including expected functionality, edge cases, and performance considerations. They aim to validate the business logic encapsulated by the function and ensure its reliability and correctness.
"""

# ********RoostGPT********
import pytest
from io import StringIO
from unittest.mock import patch
from price_comparison import cheapest

def test_cheapest_product_returned():
products = ["Product A", "Product B", "Product C"]
prices = [100, 50, 75]
name = "Website"

result = cheapest(products, prices, name)

assert result == 50

def test_top_five_products_printed():
products = ["Product A", "Product B", "Product C", "Product D", "Product E", "Product F"]
prices = [100, 50, 75, 80, 60, 90]
name = "Website"

expected_output = (
"WEBSITE TOP 5 PRODUCTS:\n"
" Product Name Price (Rs.)\n"
"-------------- -------------\n"
" Product B 50\n"
" Product E 60\n"
" Product C 75\n"
" Product D 80\n"
" Product F 90\n"
)

with patch("sys.stdout", new=StringIO()) as fake_output:
cheapest(products, prices, name)
printed_output = fake_output.getvalue()

assert printed_output == expected_output

def test_empty_product_list():
products = []
prices = []
name = "Website"

with pytest.raises(IndexError):
cheapest(products, prices, name)

def test_duplicate_prices():
products = ["Product A", "Product B", "Product C", "Product D", "Product E"]
prices = [100, 50, 50, 80, 60]
name = "Website"

expected_output = (
"WEBSITE TOP 5 PRODUCTS:\n"
" Product Name Price (Rs.)\n"
"-------------- -------------\n"
" Product B 50\n"
" Product C 50\n"
" Product E 60\n"
" Product D 80\n"
" Product A 100\n"
)

with patch("sys.stdout", new=StringIO()) as fake_output:
result = cheapest(products, prices, name)
printed_output = fake_output.getvalue()

assert result == 50
assert printed_output == expected_output

def test_large_dataset():
products = ["Product {}".format(i) for i in range(1000)]
prices = list(range(1000))
name = "Website"

result = cheapest(products, prices, name)

assert result == 0
Loading