Skip to content

Conversation

@JonathanBrouwer
Copy link
Contributor

I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes?

r? @oli-obk
cc @jdonszelmann

@rustbot rustbot added A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 23, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 23, 2025

Some changes occurred in compiler/rustc_attr_parsing

cc @jdonszelmann

@oli-obk
Copy link
Contributor

oli-obk commented Jul 23, 2025

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 23, 2025

📌 Commit af06bb9 has been approved by oli-obk

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 23, 2025
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
…ormed, r=oli-obk Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes? r? `@oli-obk` cc `@jdonszelmann`
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 23, 2025
…ormed, r=oli-obk Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes? r? ``@oli-obk`` cc ``@jdonszelmann``
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
…ormed, r=oli-obk Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes? r? ```@oli-obk``` cc ```@jdonszelmann```
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #132748 (get rid of some false negatives in rustdoc::broken_intra_doc_links) - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
fmease added a commit to fmease/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
…ormed, r=oli-obk Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes? r? ````@oli-obk```` cc ````@jdonszelmann````
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 16 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144232 (Implement support for `become` and explicit tail call codegen for the LLVM backend) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
Rollup of 15 pull requests Successful merges: - #143374 (Unquerify extern_mod_stmt_cnum.) - #143838 (std: net: uefi: Add support to query connection data) - #144014 (don't link to the nightly version of the Edition Guide in stable lints) - #144094 (Ensure we codegen the main fn) - #144218 (Use serde for target spec json deserialize) - #144221 (generate elf symbol version in raw-dylib) - #144240 (Add more test case to check if the false note related to sealed trait suppressed) - #144247 (coretests/num: use ldexp instead of hard-coding a power of 2) - #144276 (Use less HIR in check_private_in_public.) - #144278 (add Rev::into_inner) - #144317 (pass build.npm from bootstrap to tidy and use it for npm install) - #144320 (rustdoc: avoid allocating a temp String for aliases in search index) - #144334 (rustc_resolve: get rid of unused rustdoc::span_of_fragments_with_expansion) - #144335 (Don't suggest assoc ty bound on non-angle-bracketed problematic assoc ty binding) - #144358 (Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes) r? `@ghost` `@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 6dc4152 into rust-lang:master Jul 24, 2025
11 checks passed
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 24, 2025
Rollup merge of #144358 - JonathanBrouwer:fix-stability-malformed, r=oli-obk Stop using the old `validate_attr` logic for stability attributes I think this was accidentally missed when implementing the stability attributes? r? `````@oli-obk````` cc `````@jdonszelmann`````
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jul 24, 2025
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
…list, r=oli-obk Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually r? `@oli-obk` Nicer code & will prevent issues like rust-lang#144358 in the future
GuillaumeGomez added a commit to GuillaumeGomez/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 25, 2025
…list, r=oli-obk Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually r? ``@oli-obk`` Nicer code & will prevent issues like rust-lang#144358 in the future
matthiaskrgr added a commit to matthiaskrgr/rust that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2025
…list, r=oli-obk Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually r? ```@oli-obk``` Nicer code & will prevent issues like rust-lang#144358 in the future
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 26, 2025
Rollup merge of #144421 - JonathanBrouwer:cleanup-malformed-list, r=oli-obk Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually r? ```@oli-obk``` Nicer code & will prevent issues like #144358 in the future
github-actions bot pushed a commit to rust-lang/rustc-dev-guide that referenced this pull request Jul 28, 2025
…li-obk Call `is_parsed_attribute` rather than keeping track of a list of parsed attributes manually r? ```@oli-obk``` Nicer code & will prevent issues like rust-lang/rust#144358 in the future
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

A-attributes Area: Attributes (`#[…]`, `#![…]`) S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.

4 participants