Skip to content

Conversation

@reenigneEsrever92
Copy link

simplification...
I guess the original Author was trying to pursue something like a martingale (doubling) strategy (or in this case the increment over a constant factor) but well ... he did not. Instead a constant wait time was introduced, which means the wait is simply executed a 100 times over (in the worst case). And so I do not see a need for "5000000" and "+= 50000" to remain here.

simplification... I guess the original Author was trying to pursue something like a martingale (doubling) strategy (or in this case the increment over a constant factor) but well ... he did not. Instead a constant wait time was introduced, which means the wait is simply executed a 100 times over (in the worst case). And so I do not see a need for "5000000" and "+= 50000" to remain here.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

1 participant