feat(documentation): Added interactive CodeCanvas diagram for openllmetry #3431
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters. Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
|
WalkthroughAdded a new README section titled "How does Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 1 (Trivial) | ⏱️ ~3 minutes
Poem
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
✨ Finishing touches🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![ellipsis-dev[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/64358?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Important
Looks good to me! 👍
Reviewed everything up to 838b01c in 1 minute and 52 seconds. Click for details.
- Reviewed
20lines of code in1files - Skipped
1files when reviewing. - Skipped posting
3draft comments. View those below. - Modify your settings and rules to customize what types of comments Ellipsis leaves. And don't forget to react with 👍 or 👎 to teach Ellipsis.
1. README.md:63
- Draft comment:
Verify that the CodeCanvas URL parameters (repo, owner, branch) correctly reference the official repository details to avoid broken links post-merge. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Comment did not seem useful. Confidence is useful =0%<= threshold50%The comment is asking the PR author to verify the correctness of URL parameters, which falls under asking the author to double-check things. This violates the rules.
2. README.md:67
- Draft comment:
Consider using a more descriptive alt text for the diagram image to improve accessibility (e.g., detailing it's an interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough for openllmetry). - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 30% vs. threshold = 50% This is a comment about accessibility improvement for alt text on a newly added image. While accessibility is important, I need to consider: 1) Is this a clear code change requirement or just a suggestion? 2) The rules state not to comment on "obvious or unimportant" things. 3) The rules say comments should be about clear code changes required, not just nice-to-haves. 4) Alt text improvements are somewhat subjective - "CodeCanvas Screenshot" is technically descriptive, even if not ideal. 5) This is more of a quality/best practice suggestion rather than a bug or clear issue. The alt text improvement is a valid accessibility concern and the suggestion is actionable. The current alt text is generic but not technically wrong. This could be considered a code quality improvement rather than a critical issue, and the rules emphasize not making comments unless there's clearly a code change required. While accessibility is important, this falls into the category of a "nice to have" improvement rather than a clear code defect. The current alt text does describe what the image is (a CodeCanvas screenshot), even if it could be more descriptive. This is more of a subjective quality suggestion than a required change. This comment should be deleted. While the accessibility suggestion has merit, it's a subjective quality improvement rather than a clear code change requirement. The current alt text is functional and descriptive enough, making this comment fall into the "not clearly required" category per the rules.
3. README.md:67
- Draft comment:
The image width is fixed at 1916 which might not display well on smaller screens. Consider making the image responsive or using a max-width style. - Reason this comment was not posted:
Decided after close inspection that this draft comment was likely wrong and/or not actionable: usefulness confidence = 10% vs. threshold = 50% This comment is about UI/styling - specifically making an image responsive. According to the rules, I should "NOT comment on any pure frontend UI or styling changes, only logic. Assume that if the author changed the UI, they did it correctly." The comment is purely about styling/presentation (responsive design) and not about logic. Additionally, other images in the same README use fixed widths without responsive styling, suggesting this is an intentional pattern in this file. The author added this image with a fixed width, and I should assume they did it correctly per the rules. However, this is a README file, not typical frontend code, and responsive images in documentation could be considered a best practice. The comment is actionable and provides a specific code suggestion. Maybe documentation styling is different from UI styling? While documentation might be slightly different, the rule clearly states to not comment on UI or styling changes and to assume the author did it correctly. The README already has other images with fixed widths, showing this is an accepted pattern. This is purely a styling suggestion with no functional impact, and the rules explicitly say not to make such comments. This comment should be deleted because it's purely about UI/styling (responsive image design) and the rules explicitly state not to comment on frontend UI or styling changes. The author intentionally added the image with a fixed width, consistent with other images in the file, and we should assume they did it correctly.
Workflow ID: wflow_QdwDd5l0abLQALbs
You can customize 
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
README.md (1)
63-63: Use descriptive link text instead of generic "here".Markdown best practices recommend descriptive link text for accessibility and clarity. Replace the generic "here" with context-specific descriptions.
-Check out this interactive walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase on CodeCanvas [here](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). +Check out this [interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough of the openllmetry codebase](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). -To refine existing dataflow simulation or create new ones, follow the quick tutorial [here](https://docs.code-canvas.com/updating-diagram). +To refine existing dataflow simulation or create new ones, follow the [quick CodeCanvas update guide](https://docs.code-canvas.com/updating-diagram).Also applies to: 65-65
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧠 Learnings (1)
📚 Learning: 2025-08-21T04:01:31.783Z
Learnt from: prane-eth PR: traceloop/openllmetry#3330 File: packages/opentelemetry-semantic-conventions-ai/pyproject.toml:11-11 Timestamp: 2025-08-21T04:01:31.783Z Learning: The openllmetry repository uses a monorepo structure where individual packages like opentelemetry-semantic-conventions-ai do not maintain their own CHANGELOG.md files. There is a single CHANGELOG.md at the repository root level instead. Applied to files:
README.md
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
63-63: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
65-65: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
updated the image link and moved location to more appropriate spot
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
Disabled knowledge base sources:
- Linear integration is disabled by default for public repositories
You can enable these sources in your CodeRabbit configuration.
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
README.md(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
README.md
185-185: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
Comment on lines +183 to +188
| ### How does `openllmetry` work under the hood? | ||
| | ||
| Check out this interactive walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase on CodeCanvas [here](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). | ||
| | ||
| <img width="1652" height="704" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c52f8c25-d923-427a-85cc-dfee470e8b83" /> | ||
| |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Use descriptive link text instead of "here".
The link on line 185 uses "here" as anchor text, which is not descriptive per Markdown best practices. Improve the link text to convey its purpose.
Apply this diff to use more descriptive link text:
-Check out this interactive walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase on CodeCanvas [here](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). +Check out this [interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true).This moves the meaningful context ("interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough") into the link text itself, making the document more navigable and accessible.
📝 Committable suggestion
‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.
Suggested change
| ### How does `openllmetry` work under the hood? | |
| Check out this interactive walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase on CodeCanvas [here](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). | |
| <img width="1652" height="704" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c52f8c25-d923-427a-85cc-dfee470e8b83" /> | |
| ### How does `openllmetry` work under the hood? | |
| Check out this [interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough of the `openllmetry` codebase](https://www.code-canvas.com/?session=unauthenticatedGithub&repo=openllmetry&owner=traceloop&branch=main&OnboardingTutorial=true). | |
| <img width="1652" height="704" alt="image" src="https://github.com/user-attachments/assets/c52f8c25-d923-427a-85cc-dfee470e8b83" /> |
🧰 Tools
🪛 markdownlint-cli2 (0.18.1)
185-185: Link text should be descriptive
(MD059, descriptive-link-text)
🤖 Prompt for AI Agents
In README.md around lines 183 to 188, the link anchor uses the non-descriptive word "here"; replace the anchor text with a descriptive phrase such as "interactive CodeCanvas walkthrough of the openllmetry codebase" so the Markdown link reads with meaningful context and improves accessibility and navigability (update only the link text, preserving the URL). Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed. Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes. Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch. Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit. Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported. You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion. Outdated suggestions cannot be applied. This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved. Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews. Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments. Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge. Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
feat(instrumentation): ...orfix(instrumentation): ....I was trying to understand how
openllmetryworks under the hood so I created a diagram for it using code-canvas.com. I think it will be pretty helpful for contributors to quickly onboard to the inner-works ofopenllmetry.Here is the generated diagram for
openllmetrygrouped by the application's use-cases and their runtime data flows:Open openllmetry's interactive diagram
I built code canvas to simulate a senior engineer who have been working on
openllmetry's codebase for pretty long and can explain to you any functionality of the repository visually through diagrams.Here is what users are saying about codecanvas
"I used to spend 4 hours asking GPT how a use case in a codebase works and I keep going back and forth until I am able to draw a diagram to summarize my understanding,
CodeCanvas gives me that diagram in 40 seconds"
Some Notes:
openllmetry, completely free, no monthly subscription. Consider it as my contribution to help fellow contributors lower their context onboarding friction before they can start contributing.Important
Adds an interactive CodeCanvas diagram link to
README.mdforopenllmetrycodebase understanding.README.mdlinking to an interactive CodeCanvas diagram foropenllmetry.This description was created by
for 838b01c. You can customize this summary. It will automatically update as commits are pushed.
Summary by CodeRabbit