1
$\begingroup$

According to Pappus, Apollonius developed a system of number systems larger than Archimedes' The Sand Reckoner, and according to Proclus, Apollonius measured the value of pi more precisely than Archimedes, and (I don't remember the source) he considered Archimedes to be his academic rival, so I wondered if he had solved any problems that Archimedes could not solve.

If there was such a problem, what was it?

$\endgroup$
3
  • 4
    $\begingroup$ What sort of answer do you expect? How can you ascertain that Archimedes "could not solve" any particular problem? $\endgroup$ Commented May 24 at 12:48
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ Please supply precise citations (if possible to primary sources) for (1) Pappus saying that Apollonius developed a system of numbers larger than Archimedes and (2) Proclus saying that Apollonius measured the value of pi more precisely than Archimedes. $\endgroup$ Commented May 24 at 22:19
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ @Senex: If I prove a theorem, and you extend or generalize it, it does not follow that I "could not do it" as well. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25 at 12:21

1 Answer 1

1
$\begingroup$

I accidentally found a reference which probably inspired your question: this is the book by Reviel Netz,

A new history of Greek mathematics. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2022.

On p. 158 he mentions that some (unnamed) commenters in the late antiquity mentioned that Apollonius found a closer approximation to $\pi$, but they do not state this approximation explicitly. Neither they explain how it was found.

Let me add that Archimedes (and even Euclid) perfectly understood how to obtain arbitrarily close approximations to $\pi$, so his concrete approximation was just an example.

An improvement by Apollonius of Archimedes calculus from the Sand Reconer is mentioned by Pappus, but the original book of Apollonius is lost and Pappus does not give any details.

Netz concludes that Apollonius competed with Archimedes:-)

But I repeat that if some later mathematician improves on your result, this does not mean that you could not prove this.

$\endgroup$

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.