0
$\begingroup$

I'm asked to find the marginal distribution of $(X,Y)$ as $(X,Y,Z)$ is a point chosen uniformly on the unit sphere.

I've worked out that the joint density function $f_{XYZ}(x,y,z) = \frac{3}{4\pi}$ for $x^2+y^2+z^2 \leq 1.$

I know how to find the marginal distribution when dealing with 2-dimensions, but I'm not sure how I should set up the integrals in this case.

Would this be the correct way to go,

$$F_{X,Y}(x,y) = \int_{-\infty}^x \int_{-\infty}^y \int_{z} f_{XYZ}(x,y,z) dzdydx,$$

or am I really computing the marginal distribution of $F_X(x)$ if I do that?

Also, I'm having some problems understanding the difference between finding the density function and distribution function in cases like this. To me, it seems to be the same method for both functions?

$\endgroup$
15
  • $\begingroup$ You're doing the right job. The distribution of the random variable $(X,Y)$ (which is a marginal in this case) must be a function of two real variables, say $(x,y)$; you must therefore "zap" the $z$ from $f_{XYZ}$ by averaging it out. So marginal density is $$f_{XY}(x,y)=\int_{\mathbb R}f_{XYZ}(x,y,z)\operatorname dz,$$ whence (upon averagin in $x$ and $y$) your formula for $(X,Y)$'s distribution. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 9:27
  • $\begingroup$ Note that "=" should read "$\leq$" in $x^2+y^2+z^2\leq1$. I advise newbies to learn the Iverson--Knuth brackets that make the algebra much easier for this type of exercises. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 9:33
  • $\begingroup$ About the "=", you are of course right! Will edit. But if I would like to find $f_X(x)$, wouldn't I essentially compute the exact same thing? And is the density function and the distribution function the same thing in this case? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 9:45
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ There is a big difference between a ball ($\leq1$) and a sphere ($=1$). If the original question is about the unit sphere then there cannot exist a 3-dimensional density function. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 9:47
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Yes you follow the formula to integrate and obtain the joint pdf of $(X, Y)$: $\displaystyle \int_{-\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}}^{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}} \frac {3} {4\pi} dz = \frac {3} {2\pi} \sqrt{1 - x^2 - y^2}, x^2 + y^2 \leq 1$ Note that they are not uniformly distributed inside the unit disk. $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 10:52

2 Answers 2

3
$\begingroup$

A uniform distribution on the sphere does not have a density function in three variables, but the marginal distribution for two of the three variables does have a density. It is obtained by expressing the area element of the sphere $\sin\theta d\varphi\wedge d\theta$ in new coordinates $x$ and $y$ and then normalizing.

$$\eqalign{ \sin^2\theta&=x^2+y^2\\ 2\sin\theta\cos\theta d\theta&=2xdx+2ydy\\ \sin\theta d\theta&=\frac{xdx+ydy}{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}}\\ \varphi&=\arctan\left(\frac y x\right)\\ d\varphi&=\frac1{1+\frac{y^2}{x^2}}\left(\frac1xdy-\frac{y}{x^2}dx\right)\\ \sin\theta d\varphi\wedge d\theta&=\frac1{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}}dx\wedge dy\\ }$$

This gives the density function

$$\frac1{2\pi\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}}$$

on the disk $x^2+y^2\leq1.$

$\endgroup$
5
  • $\begingroup$ I am not sure I follow, would you like to specify how you reached that result? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 12:06
  • $\begingroup$ There was an error in my original volume element (missing $\sin\theta$); does this one look better? $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 12:23
  • $\begingroup$ That was very helpful, thank you! $\endgroup$ Commented Jan 25, 2016 at 12:30
  • $\begingroup$ @Justpassingby Very impressive! Could you give a reference which presents the proof details? In multivariate statistics, we know that if $x$ has a density, then any marginal distribution of $x$ has a density. However, the fact that any marginal distribution of $x$ has a density can not guarantee the density existence of $x$; uniform distribution in the surface of the unit is such a case (counterexample), but I don't know how to proof it in details? $\endgroup$ Commented Mar 9, 2023 at 3:55
  • $\begingroup$ I believe $d\varphi\wedge d\theta$ is a typo and instead we should have $d\theta \wedge d\varphi$. Alternatively, change $dx\wedge dy$ to $dy\wedge dx$. $\endgroup$ Commented May 25, 2024 at 13:34
2
$\begingroup$

An alternative solution (eschewing spherical coordinates) may be based on the approximation of the surface density by a bulk one as follows. Let $h>0$ (destined to go to zero). Consider the spherical shell $\Sigma_h$ of thickness $h$ about the sphere of radius $1$, i.e., the union of all the spheres of center $0$ and radius ranging between $1-h/2$ and $1+h/2$. Since this is a $3$-dimensional volume you may consider on it a uniform distribution (constant function) $f_{XYZ}^h\equiv c(h)$, with $c(h)$ constant in $x,y,z$ (but depending on $h$) chosen such that the integral of $f_{XYZ}^h$ is $1$. So $c(h)=1/\operatorname{vol}\Sigma_h$, which the following calculation reveals: $$ \operatorname{vol}\Sigma_h = \int_{1-h/2}^{1+h/2}\int_{\partial B_0(\rho)}\operatorname d S\operatorname d\rho = \int_{1-h/2}^{1+h/2}4\pi\rho^2\operatorname d\rho = \frac{4\pi}3\Big(3h+\frac{h^3}4\Big) = 4\pi h+\frac\pi3h^3 . $$ As $h\to0$ the mass of the shell stays $1$, $c(h)\approx1/(4\pi{h}\to\infty$ and the $f_{XYZ}^h$ converges (weakly, or in the sense of distributions, or whatever your mathematical religion prescribes, but intuition is what matters) to $f_{XYZ}$. Thanks to the integral being bounded to compute $f_{XY}$ it is legitimate to interchange limits (here the theory of distribution does come handy, but you can use geometric measure theory,if you prefer) to integrate $f^h_{XYZ}$ in $z$ first and then take $h\to0$. The integration in $z$ rests on some simple geometry, for all $x,y$ such that $x^2+y^2<(1-h/2)^2$, the line passing through $(x,y)$ intersect the shell twice symmetrically about the $(x,y)$-plane. Looking at the upper half (and then doubling the result) the length of the segment is given by $S^+_h(x,y)-S^-_h(x,y)$ where $S_h^\pm$ are functions whose graphs are the outer and inner boundaries of the (upper half of the spherical) shell, respectively. Explicitly $$S^\pm_h(x,y)=\sqrt{(1\pm h/2)^2-x^2-y^2}=:F(\pm h).$$ The auxiliary function $F$'s Taylor expansion of order $1$ about $0$ yields $$ S^+_h(x,y)-S^-_h(x,y) = 2F'(0)h+o(h) = \frac{h+o(h)}{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}} , $$ since $$F'(\xi)=\frac{1+\xi/2}{2\sqrt{(1+\xi/2)^2-x^2-y^2}}.$$ Multiplying this by $2$ (to take into account the lower half of the sphere) and the density normalizing constant $c(h)$ we obtain $$ \int_{\mathbb R} f^h_{XYZ}(x,y,z)\operatorname dz = \frac{2h+o(h)}{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}(4\pi h+\pi h^3/3)} = \frac{1+o(h^0)}{\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}(2\pi+\pi h^2/6)} \to \frac1{2\pi\sqrt{1-x^2-y^2}} ,\text{ as }h\to0 . $$

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.