2
$\begingroup$

(Note: The following post is an offshoot of this earlier MSE question: Can a multiperfect number be a perfect square?.)

Let $\sigma(x)$ denote the classical sum of divisors of the positive integer $x$.

A number $m$ satisfying $$\sigma(m)=2m$$ is said to be perfect.

More generally, we call any number $n$ satisfying $$\sigma(n)=kn$$ for $k \in \mathbb{N}$ to be multiperfect (or $k$-perfect).

It is known that multiperfect numbers cannot be squares.

Furthermore, it is also known that perfect numbers cannot be perfect powers.

I found a reference to the last statement in Walter Nissen's Concise, remarkable facts about perfect numbers:

--- Perfect Naturals are not Perfect Powers ( e.g. , perfect squares , perfect cubes , etc. ) ---

Here is my question:

Can a multiperfect number be a perfect power?

Update (August 9, 2020 - 12:04 PM Manila time) I have posted a closely related question in MO here.

$\endgroup$
4
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ Just to mention it : $1$ is not considered to be a multi-perfect number. Currently, I am checking the cubes upto some limit, no idea yet for a proof. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 7, 2020 at 22:07
  • 2
    $\begingroup$ No cube upto $10^{21}$ is multi-perfect. No $5$ th power upto $10^{30}$ is multi-perfect. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 7, 2020 at 22:13
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I checked all the multi-perfect numbers in the b-file of A007691, and none of them were perfect powers. This is all the way up to $n \approx 1.8 \cdot 10^{303}$ $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 7, 2020 at 22:35
  • $\begingroup$ @VarunVejalla: Please post your last comment as an answer, so that I can upvote it. Thank you. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2020 at 0:24

1 Answer 1

Reset to default
2
$\begingroup$

I checked all the multiperfect numbers from this site, which include all the multiperfect numbers in the b-file of A007691, as well as additional ones. The largest number that was in the list was $\approx 10^{34850339}$. None of those values were perfect powers.

What I did find for all multiperfect numbers is that there was at least one prime factor with an exponent of exactly $1$ in the prime factorization. If this could be proved for all multiperfect numbers, then the conjecture that there is no number that is both multiperfect and a perfect power could be proven.

$\endgroup$
3
  • $\begingroup$ Just curious, @VarunVejalla, what software did you use to check this? $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2020 at 23:41
  • 1
    $\begingroup$ I just used plain old Python. The numbers from Flammenkamp's site were easy to check since they were prime factorized. $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2020 at 23:42
  • $\begingroup$ Okay thanks a lot! =) $\endgroup$ Commented Aug 8, 2020 at 23:45

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.