3
$\begingroup$

This is a follow-up to those two questions: Cartesian product of two CW-complexes, and Product of CW complexes question.

Consider two cell complexes $A$ (with cells $e^m_\alpha$ and attaching maps $\varphi_\alpha$) and $B$ (with cells $e^n_\beta$ and attaching maps $\varphi_\beta$). Then $A \times B$ has a structure of a cell complex, with cells the products $e^m_\alpha \times e^n_\beta$ and attaching maps $\varphi_\alpha \times \varphi_\beta$. When applying the boundary operator to $D^m_\alpha \times D^n_\beta$, one obtains $(\partial D^m_\alpha \times D^n_\beta) \cup (D^m_\alpha \times \partial D^n_\beta)$.

My question is: how are the attaching maps $\varphi_\alpha \times \varphi_\beta$ defined with regard to the individual $\varphi_\alpha$ and $\varphi_\beta$ maps ? Apparently, the product of cell complexes is unique, so how are the attaching maps uniquely described ? How are the elements of $(\partial D^m_\alpha \times D^n_\beta) \cup (D^m_\alpha \times \partial D^n_\beta)$ mapped to the $(m+n-1)$ skeleton of the product cell complex ?

$\endgroup$

1 Answer 1

3
$\begingroup$

A particular element $\partial D^m_\alpha \times D^n_\beta$ of $\partial(D^m_\alpha \times D^n_\beta)$, is mapped to $\varphi_\alpha(\partial D^m_\alpha) \times D^n_\beta$ which is part of the $(m + n − 1)$ skeleton.

$\endgroup$

You must log in to answer this question.

Start asking to get answers

Find the answer to your question by asking.

Ask question

Explore related questions

See similar questions with these tags.